hellreich <hellreich_at_...> wrote:
well if you take a look at the CC poll you'll see witch rule is widely used,
thus should be the core rule used.
----- Original Message -----
From: peter ramos <ramospeter_at_...>
To: <netepic_at_egroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2000 9:20 AM
Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] RE: [Net Epic ML] Re: Core rule interpretations
you should leave the rules as is and put the new rules in as optional
> Hi!
>
> Agreed. The alternative the loses out in the poll will be in the optional
> section.
>
> Peter
>
>
> >From: eivind borgeteien <eivind.borgeteien_at_...>
> >Reply-To: netepic_at_egroups.com
> >To: "'netepic_at_egroups.com'" <netepic_at_egroups.com>
> >Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] RE: [Net Epic ML] Re: Core rule interpretations
> >Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 15:20:53 +0100
> >
> >I don't agree.
> >If we include both, then we cant have a proper discussion of CAF on new
> >units on this list. Only one aproach should be included in the Core
Rules,
> >the other should be an optional rule!
> >
> >Then people can freely choose what to use, but still know what we base
the
> >descissions on this list upon, and make their own houserules on this.
Thats
> >what the Optional rules is all about isn't it?
> >
> >We ablolutely can not have two sets of core rules! We have to talk the
same
> >language on this list, else it easily becomes obsolete!
> >
> >Eivind
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: peter ramos [mailto:ramospeter_at_...]
> >Sent: 31. oktober 2000 14:43
> >To: netepic_at_egroups.com
> >Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] RE: [Net Epic ML] Re: Core rule
> >interpretations
> >
> >
> >Hi!
> >
> >I have decided that it is best to include both approaches to the close
> >combat interpretation into the core rules since it is best to let
> >individual
> >
> >groups decide what approach they like best. Both approaches have pros and
> >cons to them it seems more like a matter of taste.
> >
> >Peter
> >
> >
> > >From: "dardman" <dardman_at_...>
> > >Reply-To: netepic_at_egroups.com
> > >To: <netepic_at_egroups.com>
> > >Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] RE: [Net Epic ML] Re: Core rule
interpretations
> > >Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 10:26:33 -0500
> > >
> > >That is a problem you must solve when you play the Orks. It is one of
> >their
> >
> > >advantages but remember they have a 10cm command rule. IG have similar
> > >units with the Rough rider and beastmen companies and squads.
> > >Darius
> >
> >_________________________________________________________________________
> >Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
> >
> >Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
> >http://profiles.msn.com.
> >
> >
> >
> >To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> >###########################################
> >
> >This message has been scanned by F-Secure Anti-Virus for Microsoft
> >Exchange.
> >For more information, connect to http://www.F-Secure.com/
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
>
> Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
> http://profiles.msn.com.
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
>
_____NetZero Free Internet Access and Email______
http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html
eGroups Sponsor
To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
"Is it time to play?"
---------------------------------
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Messenger - Talk while you surf! It's FREE.
Received on Tue Oct 31 2000 - 19:51:30 UTC