Hi!
I also agree that this is a very good solution! Big pat on the back to Peter
:)
Rune
-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Ramos [mailto:primarch_at_...]
Sent: 4. november 2000 04:25
To: netepic_at_egroups.com
Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Close combat interpretations: the good, the bad
and what to do.
Hi!
Hmmm.. perhaps I have stumbled on to something....
Well, I'd like to hear from as many people as possible on this one, so far I
have major proponents on both sides of the issues agreeing, that's very
good.
Peter
!!! Great idea I knew you were good for something hehehe :-) you still have
some left in that house rule sock. Not bad!!!!
Thus the bulk of epic troops are the mindless drones the background makes
them to be: IG tactics, ork boys, eldar guardians all would charge and
enegage all before ganaging up.
The elite troops however are smarter, they see teh battlefield and exploit
the holes in the line.
This has the advantage of using something already present in epic without
fancy rules and exceptions.
All good? Not quite.
It requires assigning elite status to a few more units, but not that many
more and this is mainly a editing issue me and Daniel can handle.
Well? Speak up inquiring minds need to know!
!!! I think this is a great idea, will add flavor to many of the old die
hard tuff guys like termies, and such. would also add to the fluff of how a
squad of termies can make a hole detachment of Eldar Guardians with the gang
up rule. Nice, Nice.
Peter
To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
eGroups Sponsor
<
http://click.egroups.com/1/9662/2/_/7255/_/973308364/>
<
http://adimg.egroups.com/img/9662/2/_/7255/_/973308364/WarningPets468x602E.
gif>
To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
Received on Sat Nov 04 2000 - 08:00:45 UTC