Re: [NetEpic ML] Warmonger Playtesting from Daniel

From: Daniel Wolf <MasterDanielWolf_at_...>
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 20:15:54 +0100

Hi!

I really would do some playtesting first. The results compared to the normal system would interest me.

(But i think over all the results are quite the same as with the other system stated in the rulebook; the only thing i like with hellreich's system is, that it seems a bit clearer and easier to understand for me...)

Bye
Dan Wolf
  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Peter Ramos
  To: netepic_at_egroups.com
  Sent: Monday, November 13, 2000 12:42 AM
  Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Warmonger Playtesting from Daniel


  Hi!

  I agree this looks like a better way of doing it, it also shows how titan busting weapons are vital in killing titans. If any weapon is allowed to destroy a titan on two damaging hits its no point to use the big guns, with this methods every shot counts and thus these weapons are more important.

  Depending on what people prefer we may make this the official ruling. We still need to see all the opinions involved.

  Peter
    humm We always thought it cumulative, cumulative means plus the number of hits, so in that sence 1 hit=0, 2 hits=1 so +1 to roll for damage, 3hits=2 so +2, and so on. But you are right about the CC 2 damage= a roll of 6 on the damage chat and was always one of the main reasons I was not a big Titan buyer, just to easy to take out, so put my $9, at that time each, into infatry/calvary instead, shear numbers would mean easy VP from enemy. But, when firing we just applied the rules for SH tanks and thought it the way it was. Playing this way dose show how go there armor really is, even for SH tanks.

        eGroups Sponsor
       

  To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
Received on Mon Nov 13 2000 - 19:15:54 UTC