Hi!
Will put up a poll at some point today.
Peter
>From: jyrki.saari_at_...
>Reply-To: netepic_at_egroups.com
>To: netepic_at_egroups.com
>Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Warmonger Playtesting from Daniel
>Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 09:59:05 +0200
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: EXT Peter Ramos [mailto:primarch_at_...]
>Sent: 13. November 2000 1:43
>To: netepic_at_egroups.com
>Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Warmonger Playtesting from Daniel
>
>
>Hi!
>
>I agree this looks like a better way of doing it, it also shows how titan
>busting weapons are vital in killing titans. If any weapon is allowed to
>destroy a titan on two damaging hits its no point to use the big guns, with
>this methods every shot counts and thus these weapons are more important.
>
>Depending on what people prefer we may make this the official ruling. We
>still need to see all the opinions involved.
>
>Peter
>[snip]
>
>I definetely support this method (eg. cumulative +1 to the damage rolls for
>each roll after the first in addition to the weapon bonus). How about we
>make another poll?
>
>
>
>Jyrki Saari
>
>-There is no such thing as free lunch because eating takes time and time is
>money.
>
>
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at
http://www.hotmail.com.
Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.
Received on Mon Nov 13 2000 - 14:14:02 UTC