Re: [NetEpic ML] bases

From: Peter Ramos <primarch_at_...>
Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2000 09:43:15 -0500

Hi!

Either base type is okay, I have seen people use both with no problems. The
rules don't really need or specify a base type. Then again nowadays one must
use what one can get.

Its a little in joke me and Darius have against Ed <grin>

For those who like square bases but cant get them the fantasy 20mm square
bases are the same size but elevated. I have used many and they look good.

Peter
----- Original Message -----
From: "chubbybob" <bob_at_...>
To: <netepic_at_egroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, November 25, 2000 8:43 AM
Subject: [NetEpic ML] bases


> WEEeeelllll!!! Heres a contentious point.. I am an AT/SM player from way
> back... Having said that .. I _like_ the strip bases.. if you spend time
> carefully converting and painting figures then they display them very
nicely
> ... I arrived at a compromise in my games... I put tactical, command ,
> terminator, bikes, dreadnoughts, robots, ie close order on the old square
> bases (and not necassarily full up.. Scouts, support, assault, ie open
> order, I use strip bases.. it makes very little effect on the game and in
> fact adds to the look of the thing... O.K. the strip bases are a little
more
> susceptible to artillery but the difference is so minor who cares...
>
> Bob DeAngelis
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "dardman" <dardman_at_...>
> To: <netepic_at_egroups.com>
> Sent: Saturday 25 de November de 2000 16:32
> Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] wolfguard
>
>
> Peter,
> I was thinking the same thing. Nice pieces wasted on those strip bases.
Ed,
> rebase if you can.
> Darius
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
>
Received on Sat Nov 25 2000 - 14:43:15 UTC