Hi!
Correct, the current 4.1 layout which has been completed and is being
proofread by yet another member to insure accuracy is as follows:
Armies of the Imperium that includes, space marines, IG and tech guard
Defenders of the Imperium which includes SOB and PDF
Note the multiple armies in one book are for convience and reducing
redundancy, each army is stand alone, allies are optional.
As soon as the final proofreading is done they will be available in the
vault for review.
Peter
>From: "Eivind Borgeteien" <eivind.borgeteien_at_...>
>Reply-To: netepic_at_egroups.com
>To: netepic_at_egroups.com
>Subject: [NetEpic ML] Re: Sisters of Battle
>Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 14:11:36 -0000
>
>--- In netepic_at_egroups.com, "peter ramos" <ramospeter_at_h...> wrote:
>Hi
>
>That will be netepic 4.1, right? Because in the rules I have(4.0),
>the IG, TG and PDF are together...
>
>Eivind
>
> Hi!
> >
> > The books are just organized that way for convenience, it does not
>mean
> > armies in a same book can ally with each other. It was decided to
>keep the
> > sisters of battle and PDF in the same book because they were
>created roughly
> > around the same time and they haven't been tested as much as the
>space
> > marine, IG and tech guard which are in a separate book.
> >
> > Allies are strictly optional, each army regardless if it is in a
>book with
> > other armies is meant to stand alone.
> >
> > Peter
> >
> >
> > >From: "Eivind Borgeteien" <eivind.borgeteien_at_i...>
> > >Reply-To: netepic_at_egroups.com
> > >To: netepic_at_egroups.com
> > >Subject: [NetEpic ML] Re: Sisters of Battle
> > >Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 11:43:57 -0000
> > >
> > >Hi
> > >I have wanted to try out the PDF for some time now, and finally
> > >gotten the opportunity. I dont really like the new Defenders of the
> > >Impperium booklet as I am strictly opposed to mixing armies. Theese
> > >rules opens the oppurtunity to really cheese out your opponent.
> > >
> > >The only good thing about this new armylist is the PDF forces, and
>as
> > >they are quite underdogs, they can be mixed with any force without
> > >being cheesy.
> > >
> > >Eivind
> > >
> > >--- In netepic_at_egroups.com, nils.saugen_at_s... wrote:
> > >
> > > > Well, It'll be the first test for us actually....... I think,
> > >you'll find a
> > > > battle report here later this evening or tomorrow... This might
>be
> > > > considered a prelude to our upcomming 10000 points battle
>between
> > >Chaos and
> > > > a Slann/Dark Angels alliance. This battle is in it's early
> > >planning, I guess
> > > > we're going to play it somtime after x-mas.
> > > >
> > > > Nils
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: jyrki.saari_at_n... [mailto:jyrki.saari_at_n...]
> > > > Sent: 28. november 2000 10:10
> > > > To: netepic_at_egroups.com
> > > > Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Sisters of Battle
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Someone actually uses PDF??!!! Wow! Tell me how it went after
>the
> > >battle is
> > > > over, I'd love to hear that (and I bet Weasel is interested
>too).
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Jyrki Saari
> > > >
> > > > -There is no such thing as free lunch because eating takes time
>and
> > >time is
> > > > money.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: EXT nils.saugen_at_s... [mailto:nils.saugen_at_s...]
> > > > Sent: 28. November 2000 10:11
> > > > To: netepic_at_egroups.com
> > > > Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Sisters of Battle
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Yupp I'have!!! They are really good!!!! Nearly beat a slann 3.0
>army
> > > > once!!!!! Playing them again tonight agains a knightsupported
> > >planetary
> > > > defence force!
> > > >
> > > > Nils
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: dardman [mailto:dardman_at_n...]
> > > > Sent: 25. november 2000 16:39
> > > > To: netepic_at_egroups.com
> > > > Subject: [NetEpic ML] Sisters of Battle
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Has anyone tried to play a Sisters of Battle army? I was
>looking at
> > >the rule
> > > > last night and it seems like a cool alternative or at least a
>good
> > >SM/IG
> > > > ally.
> > > > Darius
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > eGroups Sponsor
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> ><http://rd.yahoo.com/M=150967.1016644.2717500.908943/D=egroupmail/S=1
>7
> > >000590
> > > >
> >
> >80:N/A=468535/*http://ad.doubleclick.net/jump/N1198.egroups.com/B2610
>5
> > >;sz=46
> > > > 8x60;ord=975399240?> click here
> > > >
> > > > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> > >
> >
> >
>______________________________________________________________________
>_______________
> > Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download :
>http://explorer.msn.com
>
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download :
http://explorer.msn.com
Received on Tue Nov 28 2000 - 14:23:24 UTC