Definately a better wording. I think we should rewrite some of the text in
the chaos rules... would reduce the time spent on arguments by roughly 1
hour for every battle :)
Trygve
-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Ramos [mailto:primarch_at_...]
Sent: 5. mars 2001 18:35
To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Conflicting Rules
Hi!
This is the correct interpretation. I agree that perhpas the wording
should be changed in the case when a unit uses ita morale stat as a save and
not as a check. So units with a confessor would not make "morale checks",
but chaos powers would induce "a save with its morale as the target number".
Is this a better wording?
Peter
quester wrote:
The power would over ride the rule becouse it is using you moral leavel
as a save not as a brake test This applyes to all GW games sence they
cabined willpower and leadership stats
The power should be worded as take a willpower test by using the target
brake test number
Ron
nils.saugen_at_... wrote:
Hi,
This Topic is a real pain for me. There are rules that come into
conflict
with each other, most often these revolve around moral testes.
For instance if you include a Confessor in a detachment, the rules
state
that that detachement he joins won't make a moral check for any
reason. Then
you have Chaos powers that state that every unit, even those that
normaly
don't take moral tests, should make a moral test. There are several
excaples
of this "Conflict of Moral", which rule should take presidens?
Nils
To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.co!
m/info/terms/
RuneSmith Studio "we bring the art to war"
15 Summit Ave.
Albany, NY. 12209
http://odin.prohosting.com/quester6
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Personal Address - Get email at your own domain with Yahoo!
Mail.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Received on Mon Mar 05 2001 - 22:04:30 UTC