Nay the cost is fine, He should have gotten his save since it is a Physical
NON psyhic attack. This would have made a big difference. Plus if he had
taken Kroxigors instead of assault Tin cans he would of negated all your
arua powers, and been able to fight you toe to toe. It seems the SM player
had failed to take the Grey Knights witch when fighting Chaos also need to
be taken. This would have made a huge differance in game play. Mostly the
hide the Deamon trick dose not work to well when this unit pops up out of no
where in the deamons face.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Trygve Bj�rnstad" <trygve_at_...>
To: <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2001 8:14 AM
Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Anihilator Battlefortress
> I think the Conqueror is okay with 4 attacks (although 4 "certain" hits
> at -1d6 is a real pain:)), but I'm not too happy with the titan having 4
> attacks at 100cm. After all it is a "small and fast" titan, and shouldn't
> have this kind of range... But the cost as is might be a bit too high...
>
> Trygve
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Karlsen Rune [mailto:rune.karlsen_at_...]
> > Sent: 5. mars 2001 14:50
> > To: 'netepic_at_yahoogroups.com'
> > Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Anihilator Battlefortress
> >
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > The Necron Titan has the same weapon, and has only
> > 2 attacks. I dont know what the original intention
> > was, but at 350 for a Conqueror, 4 attacks are
> > not unwarranted. I would not like to see the Slann
> > reduced even more, and i feel most of their units
> > are pretty well priced as is (except perhaps
> > the necron knights and titan, which are imo
> > overpriced, but this will have to be playtested
> > further). It seems to me that we have been busy
> > downgrading alot of Slann forces lately, so
> > a little upgrade would be welcome, as long
> > as the prices are adjusted (The battlefortress
> > would have to cost more of course). The Necron
> > titan might be worth 750 points if it had 4
> > attacks instead of 2 with the Conversion Beamer
> > Cannon. This would also have to be calculated.
> >
> > Rune
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: nils.saugen_at_... [mailto:nils.saugen@...]
> > > Sent: 5. mars 2001 14:31
> > > To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> > > Subject: [NetEpic ML] Anihilator Battlefortress
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Just somting I was wondering about.
> > >
> > > The Conquror and the Anihilator have the same number of
> > > attacks with their
> > > Conversion Beamer Cannon. However, the Anihilator has two
> > > turrets as opposed
> > > to one for the conquror. I Would argue that the Anihilator
> > > the ought to have
> > > more attacks with it's two turrets than the Conquror.
> > >
> > > As I see it there are three options:
> > > * Leave as is.
> > > * Increase the number of attacks for the Anihilator.
> > > * Decrease the number of attacks for the Conquror.
> > >
> > > Nils
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > >
> > >
> >
> > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
Received on Tue Mar 06 2001 - 04:22:19 UTC