UUUggg you guys always seem to leave out the almighty repair roll this is
worth about 50- 200 pts depending what it is that has it.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Karlsen Rune" <rune.karlsen_at_...>
To: <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2001 9:00 AM
Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Anihilator Battlefortress
> 4 certain hits? haha, do you remember my rolls? :)
> I didnt kill one unit in the first round with either
> of the Conquerors :)
>
> As the titan is now, its overpriced. Nils ran it
> through the cost formula, and came up with 450 points...
> I dont know what the cost should be, but somewhere
> around that sounds fair.
>
> Rune
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Trygve Bj�rnstad [mailto:trygve_at_...]
> > Sent: 5. mars 2001 17:14
> > To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Anihilator Battlefortress
> >
> >
> > I think the Conqueror is okay with 4 attacks (although 4
> > "certain" hits
> > at -1d6 is a real pain:)), but I'm not too happy with the
> > titan having 4
> > attacks at 100cm. After all it is a "small and fast" titan,
> > and shouldn't
> > have this kind of range... But the cost as is might be a bit
> > too high...
> >
> > Trygve
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Karlsen Rune [mailto:rune.karlsen_at_...]
> > > Sent: 5. mars 2001 14:50
> > > To: 'netepic_at_yahoogroups.com'
> > > Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Anihilator Battlefortress
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > The Necron Titan has the same weapon, and has only
> > > 2 attacks. I dont know what the original intention
> > > was, but at 350 for a Conqueror, 4 attacks are
> > > not unwarranted. I would not like to see the Slann
> > > reduced even more, and i feel most of their units
> > > are pretty well priced as is (except perhaps
> > > the necron knights and titan, which are imo
> > > overpriced, but this will have to be playtested
> > > further). It seems to me that we have been busy
> > > downgrading alot of Slann forces lately, so
> > > a little upgrade would be welcome, as long
> > > as the prices are adjusted (The battlefortress
> > > would have to cost more of course). The Necron
> > > titan might be worth 750 points if it had 4
> > > attacks instead of 2 with the Conversion Beamer
> > > Cannon. This would also have to be calculated.
> > >
> > > Rune
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: nils.saugen_at_... [mailto:nils.saugen@...]
> > > > Sent: 5. mars 2001 14:31
> > > > To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> > > > Subject: [NetEpic ML] Anihilator Battlefortress
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Just somting I was wondering about.
> > > >
> > > > The Conquror and the Anihilator have the same number of
> > > > attacks with their
> > > > Conversion Beamer Cannon. However, the Anihilator has two
> > > > turrets as opposed
> > > > to one for the conquror. I Would argue that the Anihilator
> > > > the ought to have
> > > > more attacks with it's two turrets than the Conquror.
> > > >
> > > > As I see it there are three options:
> > > > * Leave as is.
> > > > * Increase the number of attacks for the Anihilator.
> > > > * Decrease the number of attacks for the Conquror.
> > > >
> > > > Nils
> > > >
> > > > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> > > >
> > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > > > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
Received on Tue Mar 06 2001 - 04:27:23 UTC