Hi!
They have been tested with 4 and 8 dice respectively at their current
cost and they are okay. Before you think 8 attack dice are the greatest
thing, remeber NO shields! Self-repair is fun and useful, but no match
for shields.
What is the preference?
Peter
quester wrote:
> Thats the way I read it also as 2 batterys of 4 attacks each
>
> nils.saugen_at_... wrote:
>
> Ok in the description of the conquror it says that it has a pair
> of twin
> batteries...
>
> Now the Anihilator is similar but hat two turrets.... I think that
> 8 attacks
> at a 100 cm, a to hit roll of 3+ and save modifyer -1d6 is way,way,
> overboard!!! However it could have one Twin liked and one regular
> giving it
> 6 shots....
>
> Nils
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Karlsen Rune [mailto:rune.karlsen_at_...]
> Sent: 5. mars 2001 14:50
> To: 'netepic_at_yahoogroups.com'
> Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Anihilator Battlefortress
>
>
> Hi!
>
> The Necron Titan has the same weapon, and has only
> 2 attacks. I dont know what the original intention
> was, but at 350 for a Conqueror, 4 attacks are
> not unwarranted. I would not like to see the Slann
> reduced even more, and i feel most of their units
> are pretty well priced as is (except perhaps
> the necron knights and titan, which are imo
> overpriced, but this will have to be playtested
> further). It seems to me that we have been busy
> downgrading alot of Slann forces lately, so
> a little upgrade would be welcome, as long
> as the prices are adjusted (The battlefortress
> would have to cost more of course). The Necron
> titan might be worth 750 points if it had 4
> attacks instead of 2 with the Conversion Beamer
> Cannon. This would also have to be calculated.
>
> Rune
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nils.saugen_at_... [mailto:nils.saugen_at_...]
> > Sent: 5. mars 2001 14:31
> > To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: [NetEpic ML] Anihilator Battlefortress
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Just somting I was wondering about.
> >
> > The Conquror and the Anihilator have the same number of
> > attacks with their
> > Conversion Beamer Cannon. However, the Anihilator has two
> > turrets as opposed
> > to one for the conquror. I Would argue that the Anihilator
> > the ought to have
> > more attacks with it's two turrets than the Conquror.
> >
> > As I see it there are three options:
> > * Leave as is.
> > * Increase the number of attacks for the Anihilator.
> > * Decrease the number of attacks for the Conquror.
> >
> > Nils
> >
> > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
> RuneSmith Studio "we bring the art to war"
>
> 15 Summit Ave.
>
> Albany, NY. 12209
>
> http://odin.prohosting.com/quester6
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail Personal Address
> <http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/?.refer=mailiyfoot> - Get email at
> your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> [AirForce.com]
> <http://rd.yahoo.com/M=182283.1338155.2932296/D=egroupmail/S=1700059081:N/A=597630/*http://www.airforce.com/cgi-bin/media/setmedia.cgi?media=YH12Q201>
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
> <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
Received on Tue Mar 06 2001 - 21:37:20 UTC