RE: [NetEpic ML] Close Combat

From: <nils.saugen_at_...>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2001 11:02:44 +0100

Actually neither Rune or I argued with you on this subject!!! I was tired it
was 0100 in the morning and I wanted to go home!!!

Nils

-----Original Message-----
From: Eivind Borgeteien [mailto:eivind.borgeteien_at_...]
Sent: 7. mars 2001 10:58
To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Close Combat


Thanks!

When it comes to the rules I'm usually right, but when I get three peolpe
talking against me I tend to give up.

I might not do that next time...

Eivind
----- Original Message -----
From: <jyrki.saari_at_...>
To: <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 10:34 AM
Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Close Combat


>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Eivind Borgeteien [mailto:eivind.borgeteien_at_...]
> Sent: 07. March 2001 11:13
> To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [NetEpic ML] Close Combat
>
>
> The rules concerning vehicles with troops in close combat is as follows:
>
>
>
> BM__Toc497575985Vehicles with Troops<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns =
> "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />
>
>
> When the enemy charges a vehicle that is transporting troops, the
> transported can fight in Close Combat providing that:
>
> 1. They have Charge orders (this should be explicit; in Net
> Epic the vehicle and the troops can be given different orders),
>
> 2. The vehicle is unmoved (if it has completed its move,
there
> won't be any time for the troops to disembark).
>
>
>
> My fellow gamers think that this rule allows the transported troops to get
> out of their transports and move away from the combat at hand, as it
doesn't
> say anything about the transported troops being pinned by the attacking
> unit. This must be wrong! Right?
>
> JS: Right. The rule says they can move out TO FIGHT IN CC. Not that they
can
> run away.
>
>
>
> Could we please have a sentence here saying that transported troops are
> pinned if the transporter is being charged?
>
> JS: That should be in order, if conclusions like that can be drawn.
> Something like: "The troops may only move out to fight the enemy that
> charged the transport in CC. They may not move away from the CC". Also, I
> think the sentence "When the enemy charges a vehicle that is transporting
> troops, the transported can fight in Close Combat..." should be changed to
> "When the enemy charges a vehicle that is transporting troops, the
> transported troops can disembark to fight in Close Combat...". Otherwise
> some wiseguy probably claims that the troops fought from inside the
vehicle
> and can not be fired at in the AFPh.
>
> Eivind
>
>
>
> Jyrki Saari
>
> -There is no such thing as free lunch because eating takes time and time
is
> money.
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>


To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Received on Wed Mar 07 2001 - 10:02:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:59:18 UTC