So if none of you guys argued anything, who told me I could move the models
out of the vehicle and move through the building then?
Btw, why do we bother other people wit our arguments?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nils.saugen_at_... [mailto:nils.saugen@...]
> Sent: 7. mars 2001 11:03
> To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Close Combat
>
>
> Actually neither Rune or I argued with you on this subject!!! I
> was tired it
> was 0100 in the morning and I wanted to go home!!!
>
> Nils
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eivind Borgeteien [mailto:eivind.borgeteien_at_...]
> Sent: 7. mars 2001 10:58
> To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Close Combat
>
>
> Thanks!
>
> When it comes to the rules I'm usually right, but when I get three peolpe
> talking against me I tend to give up.
>
> I might not do that next time...
>
> Eivind
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <jyrki.saari_at_...>
> To: <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 10:34 AM
> Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Close Combat
>
>
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ext Eivind Borgeteien [mailto:eivind.borgeteien_at_...]
> > Sent: 07. March 2001 11:13
> > To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: [NetEpic ML] Close Combat
> >
> >
> > The rules concerning vehicles with troops in close combat is as follows:
> >
> >
> >
> > BM__Toc497575985Vehicles with Troops<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns =
> > "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />
> >
> >
> > When the enemy charges a vehicle that is transporting troops, the
> > transported can fight in Close Combat providing that:
> >
> > 1. They have Charge orders (this should be
> explicit; in Net
> > Epic the vehicle and the troops can be given different orders),
> >
> > 2. The vehicle is unmoved (if it has completed its move,
> there
> > won't be any time for the troops to disembark).
> >
> >
> >
> > My fellow gamers think that this rule allows the transported
> troops to get
> > out of their transports and move away from the combat at hand, as it
> doesn't
> > say anything about the transported troops being pinned by the attacking
> > unit. This must be wrong! Right?
> >
> > JS: Right. The rule says they can move out TO FIGHT IN CC. Not that they
> can
> > run away.
> >
> >
> >
> > Could we please have a sentence here saying that transported troops are
> > pinned if the transporter is being charged?
> >
> > JS: That should be in order, if conclusions like that can be drawn.
> > Something like: "The troops may only move out to fight the enemy that
> > charged the transport in CC. They may not move away from the
> CC". Also, I
> > think the sentence "When the enemy charges a vehicle that is
> transporting
> > troops, the transported can fight in Close Combat..." should be
> changed to
> > "When the enemy charges a vehicle that is transporting troops, the
> > transported troops can disembark to fight in Close Combat...". Otherwise
> > some wiseguy probably claims that the troops fought from inside the
> vehicle
> > and can not be fired at in the AFPh.
> >
> > Eivind
> >
> >
> >
> > Jyrki Saari
> >
> > -There is no such thing as free lunch because eating takes time and time
> is
> > money.
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Received on Wed Mar 07 2001 - 10:07:22 UTC