Re: [NetEpic ML] Anihilator Battlefortress

From: Hellreich <helreich_at_...>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2001 07:37:33 -0800

Right it works this way, one is a MBT and the other is a heavy support APC.
works out great as one can say that they added room to carry troops from the
same design.
----- Original Message -----
From: <nils.saugen_at_...>
To: <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 2:33 AM
Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Anihilator Battlefortress


> Keep as is, then we can keep the Conquror with 4 attacks aswell!!!
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Karlsen Rune [mailto:rune.karlsen_at_...]
> Sent: 7. mars 2001 11:29
> To: 'netepic_at_yahoogroups.com'
> Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Anihilator Battlefortress
>
>
> If it works, dont mess with it :)
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Peter Ramos [mailto:primarch_at_...]
> > Sent: 6. mars 2001 22:37
> > To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Anihilator Battlefortress
> >
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > They have been tested with 4 and 8 dice respectively at their current
> > cost and they are okay. Before you think 8 attack dice are
> > the greatest
> > thing, remeber NO shields! Self-repair is fun and useful, but
> > no match
> > for shields.
> >
> > What is the preference?
> >
> > Peter
> >
> > quester wrote:
> >
> > > Thats the way I read it also as 2 batterys of 4 attacks each
> > >
> > > nils.saugen_at_... wrote:
> > >
> > > Ok in the description of the conquror it says that it
> > has a pair
> > > of twin
> > > batteries...
> > >
> > > Now the Anihilator is similar but hat two turrets.... I
> > think that
> > > 8 attacks
> > > at a 100 cm, a to hit roll of 3+ and save modifyer -1d6
> > is way,way,
> > > overboard!!! However it could have one Twin liked and
> > one regular
> > > giving it
> > > 6 shots....
> > >
> > > Nils
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Karlsen Rune [mailto:rune.karlsen_at_...]
> > > Sent: 5. mars 2001 14:50
> > > To: 'netepic_at_yahoogroups.com'
> > > Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Anihilator Battlefortress
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > The Necron Titan has the same weapon, and has only
> > > 2 attacks. I dont know what the original intention
> > > was, but at 350 for a Conqueror, 4 attacks are
> > > not unwarranted. I would not like to see the Slann
> > > reduced even more, and i feel most of their units
> > > are pretty well priced as is (except perhaps
> > > the necron knights and titan, which are imo
> > > overpriced, but this will have to be playtested
> > > further). It seems to me that we have been busy
> > > downgrading alot of Slann forces lately, so
> > > a little upgrade would be welcome, as long
> > > as the prices are adjusted (The battlefortress
> > > would have to cost more of course). The Necron
> > > titan might be worth 750 points if it had 4
> > > attacks instead of 2 with the Conversion Beamer
> > > Cannon. This would also have to be calculated.
> > >
> > > Rune
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: nils.saugen_at_... [mailto:nils.saugen@...]
> > > > Sent: 5. mars 2001 14:31
> > > > To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> > > > Subject: [NetEpic ML] Anihilator Battlefortress
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Just somting I was wondering about.
> > > >
> > > > The Conquror and the Anihilator have the same number of
> > > > attacks with their
> > > > Conversion Beamer Cannon. However, the Anihilator has two
> > > > turrets as opposed
> > > > to one for the conquror. I Would argue that the Anihilator
> > > > the ought to have
> > > > more attacks with it's two turrets than the Conquror.
> > > >
> > > > As I see it there are three options:
> > > > * Leave as is.
> > > > * Increase the number of attacks for the Anihilator.
> > > > * Decrease the number of attacks for the Conquror.
> > > >
> > > > Nils
> > > >
> > > > To unsubscribe send e-mail to:
> > netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> > > >
> > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > > > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > >
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > RuneSmith Studio "we bring the art to war"
> > >
> > > 15 Summit Ave.
> > >
> > > Albany, NY. 12209
> > >
> > > http://odin.prohosting.com/quester6
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > ----------
> > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > Yahoo! Mail Personal Address
> > > <http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/?.refer=mailiyfoot> - Get email at
> > > your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
> > > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> > > [AirForce.com]
> > >
> > <http://rd.yahoo.com/M=182283.1338155.2932296/D=egroupmail/S=1
>
700059081:N/A=597630/*http://www.airforce.com/cgi-bin/media/setmedia.cgi?med
> ia=YH12Q201>
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
> > <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
Received on Wed Mar 07 2001 - 15:37:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:59:18 UTC