From: peter ramos <ramospeter_at_...>
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2001 08:54:23 -0500
Hi!
If there is no opposition we leave it as originally intended at 4 attack dice for the conqueror and 8 for the annihilator.
Peter
>From: "Hellreich"
>Reply-To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
>To:
>Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Anihilator Battlefortress
>Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2001 07:37:33 -0800
>
>Right it works this way, one is a MBT and the other is a heavy support APC.
>works out great as one can say that they added room to carry troops from the
>same design.
>----- Original Message -----
>From:
>To:
>Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 2:33 AM
>Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Anihilator Battlefortress
>
>
> > Keep as is, then we can keep the Conquror with 4 attacks aswell!!!
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Karlsen Rune [mailto:rune.karlsen_at_...]
> > Sent: 7. mars 2001 11:29
> > To: 'netepic_at_yahoogroups.com'
> > Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Anihilator Battlefortress
> >
> >
> > If it works, dont mess with it :)
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Peter Ramos [mailto:primarch_at_...]
> > > Sent: 6. mars 2001 22:37
> > > To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> > > Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Anihilator Battlefortress
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > They have been tested with 4 and 8 dice respectively at their current
> > > cost and they are okay. Before you think 8 attack dice are
> > > the greatest
> > > thing, remeber NO shields! Self-repair is fun and useful, but
> > > no match
> > > for shields.
> > >
> > > What is the preference?
> > >
> > > Peter
> > >
> > > quester wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thats the way I read it also as 2 batterys of 4 attacks each
> > > >
> > > > nils.saugen_at_... wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Ok in the description of the conquror it says that it
> > > has a pair
> > > > of twin
> > > > batteries...
> > > >
> > > > Now the Anihilator is similar but hat two turrets.... I
> > > think that
> > > > 8 attacks
> > > > at a 100 cm, a to hit roll of 3+ and save modifyer -1d6
> > > is way,way,
> > > > overboard!!! However it could have one Twin liked and
> > > one regular
> > > > giving it
> > > > 6 shots....
> > > >
> > > > Nils
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Karlsen Rune [mailto:rune.karlsen_at_...]
> > > > Sent: 5. mars 2001 14:50
> > > > To: 'netepic_at_yahoogroups.com'
> > > > Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Anihilator Battlefortress
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi!
> > > >
> > > > The Necron Titan has the same weapon, and has only
> > > > 2 attacks. I dont know what the original intention
> > > > was, but at 350 for a Conqueror, 4 attacks are
> > > > not unwarranted. I would not like to see the Slann
> > > > reduced even more, and i feel most of their units
> > > > are pretty well priced as is (except perhaps
> > > > the necron knights and titan, which are imo
> > > > overpriced, but this will have to be playtested
> > > > further). It seems to me that we have been busy
> > > > downgrading alot of Slann forces lately, so
> > > > a little upgrade would be welcome, as long
> > > > as the prices are adjusted (The battlefortress
> > > > would have to cost more of course). The Necron
> > > > titan might be worth 750 points if it had 4
> > > > attacks instead of 2 with the Conversion Beamer
> > > > Cannon. This would also have to be calculated.
> > > >
> > > > Rune
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: nils.saugen_at_... [mailto:nils.saugen@...]
> > > > > Sent: 5. mars 2001 14:31
> > > > > To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> > > > > Subject: [NetEpic ML] Anihilator Battlefortress
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > Just somting I was wondering about.
> > > > >
> > > > > The Conquror and the Anihilator have the same number of
> > > > > attacks with their
> > > > > Conversion Beamer Cannon. However, the Anihilator has two
> > > > > turrets as opposed
> > > > > to one for the conquror. I Would argue that the Anihilator
> > > > > the ought to have
> > > > > more attacks with it's two turrets than the Conquror.
> > > > >
> > > > > As I see it there are three options:
> > > > > * Leave as is.
> > > > > * Increase the number of attacks for the Anihilator.
> > > > > * Decrease the number of attacks for the Conquror.
> > > > >
> > > > > Nils
> > > > >
> > > > > To unsubscribe send e-mail to:
> > > netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> > > > >
> > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > > > > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> > > >
> > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > > > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> > > >
> > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > > > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > RuneSmith Studio "we bring the art to war"
> > > >
> > > > 15 Summit Ave.
> > > >
> > > > Albany, NY. 12209
> > > >
> > > > http://odin.prohosting.com/quester6
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > > ----------
> > > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > > Yahoo! Mail Personal Address
> > > > - Get email at
> > > > your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
> > > > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> > > > [AirForce.com]
> > > >
> > > > >
>700059081:N/A=597630/*http://www.airforce.com/cgi-bin/media/setmedia.cgi?med
> > ia=YH12Q201>
> > >
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
> > > .
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
>
>
>To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Received on Wed Mar 07 2001 - 13:54:23 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:59:18 UTC