Hi!
Thanks for the explanation Ed, for now I guess we should test it.
Peter
Eivind Borgeteien wrote:
> OK, thanks, but I still uphold my vote for no morale value. This was the
> original so I want ti stay with it.
>
> Eivind
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Hellreich" <helreich_at_...>
> To: <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 4:37 AM
> Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Are we in agreement?
>
>
>> Ok I try a shot at this one. The way we play at my group is if you have a
>> morale of 1 when you take a test, if you roll a 1 you fail, as this was
>> always a GW rule that a 1 is always a fail. If you were to have a zero
>
> then
>
>> you would never test at all. Plus these values get used for save when
>> playing Chaos. Some Chaos powers have mods that are used when you have to
>> make a morale save. Now a 1 and a zero mean alot here for I do belive one
>
> of
>
>> the Chaos powers has like a -2 -3 mod to apply to the roll.
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Eivind Borgeteien" <eivind.borgeteien_at_...>
>> To: <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
>> Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 3:25 PM
>> Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Are we in agreement?
>>
>>
>>> Well, then somebody must explain to me the difference of 0 and 1
>>
>> moralvalue.
>>
>>> As I see it there are no difference regarding breaktests as there are no
>>> modifiers when checking morale when breaking.
>>>
>>> So to me, a morale of 1 or 0 is just the same.
>>>
>>> Eivind
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: <primarch_at_...>
>>> To: <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
>>> Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 8:02 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Are we in agreement?
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hi!
>>>>
>>>> Seems we have enough nods. I suggest the idea brought by Ed and
>>>> others regarding a "0" morale be tested, perhpas it may be used in
>>>> the near future.
>>>>
>>>> Peter
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --- In netepic_at_y..., "Eivind Borgeteien" <eivind.borgeteien_at_c...>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Nod :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> Eivind
>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> From: <primarch_at_b...>
>>>>> To: <netepic_at_y...>
>>>>> Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 9:01 PM
>>>>> Subject: [NetEpic ML] Are we in agreement?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It seems the never ending "kroxigor" and "Emperor's children"
>>>>>
>>>> threads
>>>>
>>>>>> have quieted down.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To recap is this what has been agreed on?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1. Kroxigor, 150 point cost, +2 CAF bonus against chaos ONLY,
>>>>>
>>>> immune
>>>>
>>>>>> to psychic powers. Demons can still save versus their attacks,
>>>>>
>>>> but at
>>>>
>>>>>> double card cost.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2. Morale checks, accounts for everything from fear.terror to mind
>>>>>> affecting powers, one stat one use. Units that have no morale stat
>>>>>> are immune to checks that affect morale (fear/terror,mind powers,
>>>>>> etc.).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Give me the last nod before I redo all this.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
>>>>>
>>>> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>>>>
>>>> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
>>>
>> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>>>
>>> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
>>
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>>
>>
>> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>>
>> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>>
>>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
Received on Tue Mar 20 2001 - 22:52:51 UTC