sounds like battle tech tanks LOL
Kenneth L Peters <tzeentch666_at_...> wrote:
--- In netepic_at_y..., Peter Ramos
wrote:
> There are several aspects I really liked about the Heresy design
and
> some I was not to happy with. Besides eliminating orders I'll
probably
> redo how artillery works. Other than that what I tested back then
worked
> pretty good.
>
> In essence, what aspects should this game cover in its rules?
Hey now, if you're gonna work on Heresy again you better involve me
ya punk ;)
Some things I'd personally like to see:
Electronic Warfare
Better Aerospace Rules
Suggested Changes
IGO-UGO. Move and fire one unit then move and fire another unit. When
I say unit I mean groups, not one vehicle from a squad moves then
another.
Damage Levels for vehicles. Even if its Damaged, Crippled, and
Destroyed. Chits are your friend.
A simple damage system could be roll damage dice. Divide by armor =
damage points. If you want to get crazy different vehicle types can
have different levels of damage.
For example a light tank could have uhh, 2 Internal Structure or
something. At 50% DP its crippled. At full DP its blown up. Just keep
it an even number and you are golden
Mecha and Titans could just have lots of IS and armor.
Other stuff thats cool.
Kenneth
To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
RuneSmith Studio "we bring the art to war"
15 Summit Ave.
Albany, NY. 12209
http://odin.prohosting.com/quester6
---------------------------------
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Personal Address - Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
Received on Tue Mar 20 2001 - 15:50:35 UTC