Hmm, well, ive played them with 75cms range, 4+, -1 for
a while now, and that worked fine as well. Noone in
my group has any problem with the Slann as ive played
them recently. The problem is, that the Gravguards and
the Spawnguards have to fill different roles, otherwise
its pointless having them both. The Slann also lack any
other infantry with any range, and they are largely a shooty army.
The Gravguards are also the only infantry i can think of which
can take out shields from a reasonable distance.
Besides, why wouldnt a shooty army have HW infantry with
better range? How are the Slann supposed to take out
Titans with 150cm range weapons placed behind the
lines if they have few units with any range?
At 900 for 16 stands, i think a 75cm range is reasonable :)
Rune
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dardman [mailto:dardman_at_...]
> Sent: 22. mars 2001 15:56
> To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Updated files now available!
>
>
> I thought it was agreed the Grav guards would act as the support but
> wouldn't have a 75cm range but maintain its 4+ to hit and -1
> TSM with a
> range of 50cm. Peter and I used them with those stats and
> they were fine. I
> remember that being a point of discussion 3 weeks ago.
> Darius
>
>
> Shop online without a credit card
> http://www.rocketcash.com
> RocketCash, a NetZero subsidiary
>
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> ---------------------~-~>
> Make good on the promise you made at graduation to keep
> in touch. Classmates.com has over 14 million registered
> high school alumni--chances are you'll find your friends!
> http://us.click.yahoo.com/03IJGA/DMUCAA/4ihDAA/JfNVlB/TM
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -------_->
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
Received on Thu Mar 22 2001 - 12:59:38 UTC