this sounds great! in the long run it would be cool with the book you
are talking about and some colofull cards to play with (all in PDF).
should the photos be from real battles or will spectacular scenes do
as well. I think I know the answer to that... anyway, some rule
clarifying shots with accompaning schematic wievs would be great.
//fred
--- In netepic_at_y..., Peter Ramos <primarch_at_b...> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> <grin> no worries, I'm not much of a painter, I paint pretty
functional
> (i.e uninspired-I really HATE painting), not a prize winner in the
whole
> lot (especially my earlier stuff like the IG, actually you can
probably
> guess which armies I painted later on when a got a little better at
it).
>
> Please send any all pictures you can to Daniel for the project.
This
> goes to all members out there. Daniel will pick those that look the
best
> in the new layout. I will be the first happiest of all to have the
book
> studed with fabulous pictures from every member out there, a true
> testament to net epic cooperation!
>
> Also at some point if the contributions are many I'll redo the
cards
> with better examples of painted units, its very easy top do.
>
> I have always wanted such a book for net epic, now we have someone
who
> can deliver the goods (Daniel), so support him as best as you all
can,
> and it will be great!
>
> Peter
>
> Christian Danckworth wrote:
>
> > hey daniel - great idea - i could try to support you by sending
you
> > some pics of epic models with a digicam - and - please don�t be
angry
> > out there - i don�t wanna be arrogant, in a better looking
> > paint/colorscheme than most of the models on the netepic-
armycards.
> >
> > i like netepic a lot (as a former 2nd edition-player) - the rules
are
> > the most important thing - but great layout/artwork supports the
> > atmosphere/ backround- feeling !!!!!! the next week i have no
time at
> > all - but the following time. would be great to hear from you !
> >
> > christian danckworth (www.fantastictool.net
> > <http://www.fantastictool.net>)
> >
Received on Sun Mar 25 2001 - 09:05:43 UTC