Hi!
I think you could divide gamers into many categories and two common ones
seem to be those that tinker with the rules and those that dont. I would
think most in this list like doing that. I myself have made some rules
(Heresy) and I know many on this list have done so too.
While its a net epic list I would like to see these rules made by other
people, more so the design philosophy they adopted to make such rules. I
have found people like the same "perks" in thier rules but take
different paths to make them work in their rules.
It would be nice to here from any members who have made an attempt at
rules and how they went about it.
Peter
Deep Tech Underwater Systems wrote:
> GW is more mediocre at writing rules, they do have
> little flashes of brilliance. But I think the answer
> is really just to twist and warp the rules to our your
> design. Myself ,(and I am sure the majority of you
> feel the same) I would like to publish my own rules/
> gaming system/ models. As my primary opponet is my
> brother rule mods are not a problem. We use a
> convolution of Warhammer 40K/ Command Decision/
> Epic40k/ Ogre/Stargrunt II/ Dirtside with bits and
> pieces chopped out of Striker and some aircraft
> bombing/ strafing rules taken from an old issue of
> Military Digest.
>
> Like anything we constantly revise them. But close
> combat ( or going to Fixed Bayonets as I call it) is
> really only an act of desperation.
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
> http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
Received on Sun Apr 08 2001 - 18:16:48 UTC