Re: [NetEpic ML] Campaign discussions

From: <primarch_at_...>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 13:58:53 -0000

Hi!

I favor detailed systems too, with supply and other factors as you
mentioned. Well probably need one of both, a "basic" and "advanced"
set if you will. Toms system is pretty good, we may use that too.

Peter


--- In netepic_at_y..., jyrki.saari_at_n... wrote:
> Especially: is it going to be a detailed system with niceties such
as
> supply, replacements, satellite reconnaissance and so forth or is
it more in
> the Axis & Allies genre. Actually, I would like to see both: many
in this
> list seem to favor simple game systems, while I like detail and
bookkeeping
> ;)
>
> Jyrki Saari
>
> -There is no such thing as free lunch because eating takes time and
time is
> money.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ext Peter Ramos [mailto:primarch_at_b...]
> > Sent: 18. May 2001 2:11
> > To: netepic_at_y...
> > Subject: [NetEpic ML] Campaign discussions
> >
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > Since things are calming down on my end we may need to
> > finally get those
> > campaign rules for net epic done. There are many ideas out there,
so
> > nows the time to post them. I would especially like to here
> > comment on
> > what these rules should encompass and what they shouldn't.
> > First we must
> > establish a general view on whats wanted then design from there.
> >
> > Let the flood gates open.
> >
> > Peter
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
Received on Fri May 18 2001 - 13:58:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:59:21 UTC