RE: RE: [NetEpic ML] Unbalanced armies?

From: Karlsen Rune <rune.karlsen_at_...>
Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 12:06:44 +0200

Doesn't that just mean that Praetorians don't have
an electrohull?

What about SH with templates? We've never
used their templates in CC either.

Rune

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Trygve Bj�rnstad [mailto:trygve_at_nextra.com]
> Sent: 28. mai 2001 11:55
> To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> Subject: RE: RE: [NetEpic ML] Unbalanced armies?
> Sensitivity: Confidential
>
>
> The rules say this:
> "Due to their size and slow speed they are vulnerable to
> close combat by
> lesser units. Close combat with Praetorians is resolved in the normal
> fashion as described under the close combat rules section.
> The special close
> combat rules for Titans do not apply to Praetorians."
>
> The way I read "do not" is that they actually "do not" follow
> titan rules,
> but I could of course be wrong... :)
>
> Trygve
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: eivind.borgeteien_at_...
> [mailto:eivind.borgeteien_at_...]
> > Sent: 28. mai 2001 11:53
> > To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: Sv: RE: [NetEpic ML] Unbalanced armies?
> > Sensitivity: Confidential
> >
> >
> > No thats not correct.
> > The templates should be used on all units that have them...
> >
> > Eivind
> > >
> > > Fra: nils.saugen_at_...
> > > Dato: 2001/05/28 Mon AM 10:15:02 CEST
> > > Til: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> > > Emne: RE: [NetEpic ML] Unbalanced armies?
> > >
> > > Old discussion really, we don't use the templates in CC
> for other than
> > > Titans. This is probably not correct as by net epic standard.
> > >
> > > Nils
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Karlsen Rune [mailto:rune.karlsen_at_...]
> > > Sent: 28. mai 2001 09:44
> > > To: 'netepic_at_yahoogroups.com'
> > > Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Unbalanced armies?
> > >
> > >
> > > I dont think we use the damage templates correctly in CC.
> > >
> > > Rune
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Trygve Bj�rnstad [mailto:trygve_at_...]
> > > Sent: 28. mai 2001 09:31
> > > To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> > > Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Unbalanced armies?
> > >
> > >
> > > It worked fine against the squat colossus the last time I tried :)
> > >
> > > Trygve
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Peter Ramos [mailto:primarch_at_...]
> > > Sent: 25. mai 2001 15:33
> > > To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> > > Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Unbalanced armies?
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > I remember the jugger tactic was good in the old days, but
> > praetorians have
> > > first fire and a template now so does it still work as well?
> > >
> > > Peter
> > >
> > > Trygve Bj�rnstad wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > I've never faced the nids, but I quite enjoy spanking squats
> > with my chaos
> > > army.
> > >
> > > I tend to field a fast-moving chaos army, moving in on the
> > little guys and
> > > unleashing the chaos powers. Especially my old friend Nurgle
> > performs very
> > > well, get close enough and breathe them to death... Just make
> > sure he can't
> > > see too many of your units in the first turn...
> > >
> > > Also, juggers are great for taking out your opponent's
> > > superheavies/praetorians...
> > >
> > > Trygve
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Sam Dale [ mailto:epic_at_...
> > > <mailto:epic_at_...> ]
> > > Sent: 23. mai 2001 02:10
> > > To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com <mailto:netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
> > > Subject: [NetEpic ML] Unbalanced armies?
> > >
> > >
> > > Hum. Tonight I was lining up a game or two for the next few
> > > weeks, and I've
> > > been refused games if I use Squats or Nids. These are veteran
> > players who
> > > won't play against these two armies.
> > >
> > > How do people who regularly go up against stumpies and bugs
> > > regularly (with
> > > marines or chaos specifically) fight these two armies.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > > Sammy Chaos. Barprop of Slaanesh and Bane of the Organised.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> > > <mailto:netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com>
> > >
> > > Your use of Ya!
> > >
> > > hoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > > <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> > > <mailto:netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com>
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > > <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms
> of Service
> > > <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> > >
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Domains Yahoo! Domains
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> <http://us.adserver.yahoo.com/l?M=201903.1443829.3021311.12689
64/D=egroupmai
> > l/S=1700059081:N/A=661891/rand=752607469>
> >
> > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
> > <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .
> >
> >
> > ***********************************************
> > This message confirms that this E-Mail
> > has been scanned for the presence of
> > Computer Virus, and deemed Virus-Free
> > by F-Secure Antivirus
> >
> > Mon, 28 May 2001 09:30:31 +0200
> > ***********************************************
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ***********************************************
> > This message confirms that this E-Mail
> > has been scanned for the presence of
> > Computer Virus, and deemed Virus-Free
> > by F-Secure Antivirus
> >
> > Mon, 28 May 2001 09:43:57 +0200
> > ***********************************************
> >
> > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
> ***********************************************
> This message confirms that this E-Mail
> has been scanned for the presence of
> Computer Virus, and deemed Virus-Free
> by F-Secure Antivirus
>
> Mon, 28 May 2001 11:54:37 +0200
> ***********************************************
>


***********************************************
This message confirms that this E-Mail
has been scanned for the presence of
Computer Virus, and deemed Virus-Free
by F-Secure Antivirus

Mon, 28 May 2001 12:06:44 +0200
***********************************************
Received on Mon May 28 2001 - 10:06:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:59:22 UTC