Old discussion really, we don't use the templates in CC for other than
Titans. This is probably not correct as by net epic standard.
Nils
-----Original Message-----
From: Karlsen Rune [mailto:rune.karlsen_at_...]
Sent: 28. mai 2001 09:44
To: 'netepic_at_yahoogroups.com'
Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Unbalanced armies?
I dont think we use the damage templates correctly in CC.
Rune
-----Original Message-----
From: Trygve Bj�rnstad [mailto:trygve_at_...]
Sent: 28. mai 2001 09:31
To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Unbalanced armies?
It worked fine against the squat colossus the last time I tried :)
Trygve
-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Ramos [mailto:primarch_at_...]
Sent: 25. mai 2001 15:33
To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Unbalanced armies?
Hi!
I remember the jugger tactic was good in the old days, but praetorians have
first fire and a template now so does it still work as well?
Peter
Trygve Bj�rnstad wrote:
I've never faced the nids, but I quite enjoy spanking squats with my chaos
army.
I tend to field a fast-moving chaos army, moving in on the little guys and
unleashing the chaos powers. Especially my old friend Nurgle performs very
well, get close enough and breathe them to death... Just make sure he can't
see too many of your units in the first turn...
Also, juggers are great for taking out your opponent's
superheavies/praetorians...
Trygve
-----Original Message-----
From: Sam Dale [ mailto:epic_at_...
<mailto:epic_at_...> ]
Sent: 23. mai 2001 02:10
To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com <mailto:netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
Subject: [NetEpic ML] Unbalanced armies?
Hum. Tonight I was lining up a game or two for the next few
weeks, and I've
been refused games if I use Squats or Nids. These are veteran players who
won't play against these two armies.
How do people who regularly go up against stumpies and bugs
regularly (with
marines or chaos specifically) fight these two armies.
Cheers,
Sammy Chaos. Barprop of Slaanesh and Bane of the Organised.
To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
<mailto:netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com>
Your use of Ya!
hoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
<
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>
To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
<mailto:netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com>
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
<
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>
To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
<
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
Yahoo! Domains Yahoo! Domains
<
http://us.adserver.yahoo.com/l?M=201903.1443829.3021311.1268964/D=egroupmai
l/S=1700059081:N/A=661891/rand=752607469>
To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
<
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .
***********************************************
This message confirms that this E-Mail
has been scanned for the presence of
Computer Virus, and deemed Virus-Free
by F-Secure Antivirus
Mon, 28 May 2001 09:30:31 +0200
***********************************************
***********************************************
This message confirms that this E-Mail
has been scanned for the presence of
Computer Virus, and deemed Virus-Free
by F-Secure Antivirus
Mon, 28 May 2001 09:43:57 +0200
***********************************************
To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Received on Mon May 28 2001 - 08:15:02 UTC