Hi!
This is correct. You use their template in close combat, but they dont
have electro-hulls or anything like that, so its a straight close
combat. Once a hit is determined select a location.
Peter
Karlsen Rune wrote:
> But that doesnt mean that the templates don't work
> in CC, it just means Praetorians do not have the
> infantry defence system of the titans. That's why
> they have a zillion bolters instead:)
>
> Rune
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: eivind.borgeteien_at_... [mailto:eivind.borgeteien_at_...]
>> Sent: 28. mai 2001 12:51
>> To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
>> Subject: RE: RE: [NetEpic ML] Unbalanced armies?
>> Sensitivity: Confidential
>>
>>
>> Its the environmental issue of leadpoisioning the
>> countryside. The overextencive use of bolterfire has lead to
>> the intoduction of titan electrohull on praetorians in non
>> EC-countries :-)
>>
>> No, just kidding.
>>
>> You are right..
>>
>> Eivind
>>
>>> Fra: Trygve Bj�rnstad <trygve_at_...>
>>> Dato: 2001/05/28 Mon PM 12:36:37 CEST
>>> Til: <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
>>> Emne: RE: RE: [NetEpic ML] Unbalanced armies?
>>>
>>> Okay, if I am wrong, could you please fill me in with what
>>
>> I've missed?
>>
>>> T
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: eivind.borgeteien_at_...
>>>
>> [mailto:eivind.borgeteien_at_...]
>>
>>>> Sent: 28. mai 2001 12:22
>>>> To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
>>>> Subject: RE: RE: [NetEpic ML] Unbalanced armies?
>>>> Sensitivity: Confidential
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Well, actually, you are!
>>>>
>>>> Since we are not members of the European Community, that rule
>>>> does not apply to games played in Norway. This is to protect
>>>> Norwegian special interessts and settlements on our coastline
>>>> north of Trondheim....
>>>>
>>>> Eivind
>>>>
>>>>> Fra: Trygve Bj�rnstad <trygve_at_...>
>>>>> Dato: 2001/05/28 Mon AM 11:54:37 CEST
>>>>> Til: <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
>>>>> Emne: RE: RE: [NetEpic ML] Unbalanced armies?
>>>>>
>>>>> The rules say this:
>>>>> "Due to their size and slow speed they are vulnerable
>>>>
>> to close combat by
>>
>>>>> lesser units. Close combat with Praetorians is
>>>>
>> resolved in the normal
>>
>>>>> fashion as described under the close combat rules section. The
>>>>
>>>> special close
>>>>
>>>>> combat rules for Titans do not apply to Praetorians."
>>>>>
>>>>> The way I read "do not" is that they actually "do not" follow
>>>>
>>>> titan rules,
>>>>
>>>>> but I could of course be wrong... :)
>>>>>
>>>>> Trygve
>>>>>
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: eivind.borgeteien_at_...
>>>>>
>> [mailto:eivind.borgeteien_at_...]
>>
>>>>>> Sent: 28. mai 2001 11:53
>>>>>> To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
>>>>>> Subject: Sv: RE: [NetEpic ML] Unbalanced armies?
>>>>>> Sensitivity: Confidential
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No thats not correct.
>>>>>> The templates should be used on all units that have them...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Eivind
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Fra: nils.saugen_at_...
>>>>>>> Dato: 2001/05/28 Mon AM 10:15:02 CEST
>>>>>>> Til: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
>>>>>>> Emne: RE: [NetEpic ML] Unbalanced armies?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Old discussion really, we don't use the templates in CC for
>>>>>>
>>>> other than
>>>>
>>>>>>> Titans. This is probably not correct as by net epic
>>>>>>
>> standard.
>>
>>>>>>> Nils
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>> From: Karlsen Rune [mailto:rune.karlsen_at_...]
>>>>>>> Sent: 28. mai 2001 09:44
>>>>>>> To: 'netepic_at_yahoogroups.com'
>>>>>>> Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Unbalanced armies?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I dont think we use the damage templates correctly in CC.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Rune
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>> From: Trygve Bj�rnstad [mailto:trygve_at_...]
>>>>>>> Sent: 28. mai 2001 09:31
>>>>>>> To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
>>>>>>> Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Unbalanced armies?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It worked fine against the squat colossus the last
>>>>>>
>> time I tried :)
>>
>>>>>>> Trygve
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>> From: Peter Ramos [mailto:primarch_at_...]
>>>>>>> Sent: 25. mai 2001 15:33
>>>>>>> To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Unbalanced armies?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I remember the jugger tactic was good in the old days, but
>>>>>>
>>>>>> praetorians have
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> first fire and a template now so does it still work as well?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Trygve Bj�rnstad wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've never faced the nids, but I quite enjoy spanking squats
>>>>>>
>>>>>> with my chaos
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> army.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I tend to field a fast-moving chaos army, moving in on the
>>>>>>
>>>>>> little guys and
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> unleashing the chaos powers. Especially my old friend Nurgle
>>>>>>
>>>>>> performs very
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> well, get close enough and breathe them to death...
>>>>>>
>> Just make
>>
>>>>>> sure he can't
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> see too many of your units in the first turn...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Also, juggers are great for taking out your opponent's
>>>>>>> superheavies/praetorians...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Trygve
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>> From: Sam Dale [ mailto:epic_at_...
>>>>>>> <mailto:epic_at_...> ]
>>>>>>> Sent: 23. mai 2001 02:10
>>>>>>> To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
>>>>>>
>> <mailto:netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
>>
>>>>>>> Subject: [NetEpic ML] Unbalanced armies?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hum. Tonight I was lining up a game or two for the next few
>>>>>>> weeks, and I've
>>>>>>> been refused games if I use Squats or Nids. These
>>>>>>
>> are veteran
>>
>>>>>> players who
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> won't play against these two armies.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> How do people who regularly go up against stumpies and bugs
>>>>>>> regularly (with
>>>>>>> marines or chaos specifically) fight these two armies.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sammy Chaos. Barprop of Slaanesh and Bane of the Organised.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe send e-mail to:
>>>>>>
>> netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>>
>>>>>>> <mailto:netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Your use of Ya!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> hoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>>>>>>> <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe send e-mail to:
>>>>>>
>> netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>>
>>>>>>> <mailto:netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe send e-mail to:
>>>>>>
>> netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>>
>>>>>>> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
>>>>>>
>> Terms of Service
>>
>>>>>>> <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yahoo! Domains Yahoo! Domains
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>> <http://us.adserver.yahoo.com/l?M=201903.1443829.3021311.1268964/D
>>>> =egroupmai
>>>>
>>>>>> l/S=1700059081:N/A=661891/rand=752607469>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
>>>>>
>> Terms of Service
>>
>>>>>> <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ***********************************************
>>>>>> This message confirms that this E-Mail
>>>>>> has been scanned for the presence of
>>>>>> Computer Virus, and deemed Virus-Free
>>>>>> by F-Secure Antivirus
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mon, 28 May 2001 09:30:31 +0200
>>>>>> ***********************************************
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ***********************************************
>>>>>> This message confirms that this E-Mail
>>>>>> has been scanned for the presence of
>>>>>> Computer Virus, and deemed Virus-Free
>>>>>> by F-Secure Antivirus
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mon, 28 May 2001 09:43:57 +0200
>>>>>> ***********************************************
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
>>>>>
>>> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>>>>>
>>>>> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
>>>>
>>> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>>>>
>>>> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
>>>
>> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>>>>
>>>> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
>>>
>> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>>>
>>> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
>>
>> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>>>
>>> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
>>
>> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>>
>>
>>
>> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>>
>> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
>> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ***********************************************
>> This message confirms that this E-Mail
>> has been scanned for the presence of
>> Computer Virus, and deemed Virus-Free
>> by F-Secure Antivirus
>>
>> Mon, 28 May 2001 12:51:22 +0200
>> ***********************************************
>>
>
>
> ***********************************************
> This message confirms that this E-Mail
> has been scanned for the presence of
> Computer Virus, and deemed Virus-Free
> by F-Secure Antivirus
>
> Mon, 28 May 2001 13:12:58 +0200
> ***********************************************
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
Received on Mon May 28 2001 - 13:57:32 UTC