Hi!
Super heavies dont have templates, the damage chart applies to firing
attacks, once hit in close combat they are eliminated.
Peter
eivind.borgeteien_at_... wrote:
> Yes, I think so.
>
> Superheavies doesnt have templates, they are gone immediatly
>
> Eivind
>
>> Fra: Trygve Bj�rnstad <trygve_at_...>
>> Dato: 2001/05/28 Mon PM 02:04:58 CEST
>> Til: <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
>> Emne: RE: RE: [NetEpic ML] Unbalanced armies?
>>
>> I guess we should put that in the Preatorian rules as well then?
>>
>> How about Superheavies?
>>
>> T
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: eivind.borgeteien_at_... [mailto:eivind.borgeteien_at_...]
>>> Sent: 28. mai 2001 14:05
>>> To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
>>> Subject: RE: RE: [NetEpic ML] Unbalanced armies?
>>> Sensitivity: Confidential
>>>
>>>
>>> On page 30 of the core rules, under the heading "Titans and Close
>>> Combat" it says:
>>>
>>> "If the loser is a Titan or Praetorian, the winner then chooses a
>>> location on the opponent and rolls for damage"
>>>
>>> Eivind
>>>
>>>> Fra: Trygve Bj�rnstad <trygve_at_...>
>>>> Dato: 2001/05/28 Mon PM 01:54:33 CEST
>>>> Til: <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
>>>> Emne: RE: RE: [NetEpic ML] Unbalanced armies?
>>>>
>>>> But where does it say that??? I've been looking "everywhere" and I just
>>>> can't find it...
>>>>
>>>> Trygve
>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Karlsen Rune [mailto:rune.karlsen_at_...]
>>>>> Sent: 28. mai 2001 13:13
>>>>> To: 'netepic_at_yahoogroups.com'
>>>>> Subject: RE: RE: [NetEpic ML] Unbalanced armies?
>>>>> Sensitivity: Confidential
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> But that doesnt mean that the templates don't work
>>>>> in CC, it just means Praetorians do not have the
>>>>> infantry defence system of the titans. That's why
>>>>> they have a zillion bolters instead:)
>>>>>
>>>>> Rune
>>>>>
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: eivind.borgeteien_at_...
>>>>>
>>> [mailto:eivind.borgeteien_at_...]
>>>
>>>>>> Sent: 28. mai 2001 12:51
>>>>>> To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
>>>>>> Subject: RE: RE: [NetEpic ML] Unbalanced armies?
>>>>>> Sensitivity: Confidential
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Its the environmental issue of leadpoisioning the
>>>>>> countryside. The overextencive use of bolterfire has lead to
>>>>>> the intoduction of titan electrohull on praetorians in non
>>>>>> EC-countries :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No, just kidding.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You are right..
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Eivind
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Fra: Trygve Bj�rnstad <trygve_at_...>
>>>>>>> Dato: 2001/05/28 Mon PM 12:36:37 CEST
>>>>>>> Til: <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
>>>>>>> Emne: RE: RE: [NetEpic ML] Unbalanced armies?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Okay, if I am wrong, could you please fill me in with what
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've missed?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> T
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>>> From: eivind.borgeteien_at_...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> [mailto:eivind.borgeteien_at_...]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sent: 28. mai 2001 12:22
>>>>>>>> To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
>>>>>>>> Subject: RE: RE: [NetEpic ML] Unbalanced armies?
>>>>>>>> Sensitivity: Confidential
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Well, actually, you are!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Since we are not members of the European Community, that rule
>>>>>>>> does not apply to games played in Norway. This is to protect
>>>>>>>> Norwegian special interessts and settlements on our coastline
>>>>>>>> north of Trondheim....
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Eivind
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Fra: Trygve Bj�rnstad <trygve_at_...>
>>>>>>>>> Dato: 2001/05/28 Mon AM 11:54:37 CEST
>>>>>>>>> Til: <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
>>>>>>>>> Emne: RE: RE: [NetEpic ML] Unbalanced armies?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The rules say this:
>>>>>>>>> "Due to their size and slow speed they are vulnerable
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> to close combat by
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> lesser units. Close combat with Praetorians is
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> resolved in the normal
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> fashion as described under the close combat rules section. The
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> special close
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> combat rules for Titans do not apply to Praetorians."
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The way I read "do not" is that they actually "do not" follow
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> titan rules,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> but I could of course be wrong... :)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Trygve
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>>>>> From: eivind.borgeteien_at_...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> [mailto:eivind.borgeteien_at_...]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Sent: 28. mai 2001 11:53
>>>>>>>>>> To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Sv: RE: [NetEpic ML] Unbalanced armies?
>>>>>>>>>> Sensitivity: Confidential
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> No thats not correct.
>>>>>>>>>> The templates should be used on all units that have them...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Eivind
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Fra: nils.saugen_at_...
>>>>>>>>>>> Dato: 2001/05/28 Mon AM 10:15:02 CEST
>>>>>>>>>>> Til: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
>>>>>>>>>>> Emne: RE: [NetEpic ML] Unbalanced armies?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Old discussion really, we don't use the templates
>>>>>>>>>>
>>> in CC for
>>>
>>>>>>>> other than
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Titans. This is probably not correct as by net epic
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> standard.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Nils
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>>>>>> From: Karlsen Rune [mailto:rune.karlsen_at_...]
>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: 28. mai 2001 09:44
>>>>>>>>>>> To: 'netepic_at_yahoogroups.com'
>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Unbalanced armies?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I dont think we use the damage templates correctly in CC.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Rune
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>>>>>> From: Trygve Bj�rnstad [mailto:trygve_at_...]
>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: 28. mai 2001 09:31
>>>>>>>>>>> To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Unbalanced armies?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It worked fine against the squat colossus the last
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> time I tried :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Trygve
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>>>>>> From: Peter Ramos [mailto:primarch_at_...]
>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: 25. mai 2001 15:33
>>>>>>>>>>> To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Unbalanced armies?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I remember the jugger tactic was good in the old days, but
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> praetorians have
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> first fire and a template now so does it still
>>>>>>>>>>
>>> work as well?
>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Trygve Bj�rnstad wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I've never faced the nids, but I quite enjoy
>>>>>>>>>>
>>> spanking squats
>>>
>>>>>>>>>> with my chaos
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> army.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I tend to field a fast-moving chaos army, moving in on the
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> little guys and
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> unleashing the chaos powers. Especially my old
>>>>>>>>>>
>>> friend Nurgle
>>>
>>>>>>>>>> performs very
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> well, get close enough and breathe them to death...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Just make
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> sure he can't
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> see too many of your units in the first turn...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Also, juggers are great for taking out your opponent's
>>>>>>>>>>> superheavies/praetorians...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Trygve
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>>>>>> From: Sam Dale [ mailto:epic_at_...
>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:epic_at_...> ]
>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: 23. mai 2001 02:10
>>>>>>>>>>> To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> <mailto:netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: [NetEpic ML] Unbalanced armies?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hum. Tonight I was lining up a game or two for
>>>>>>>>>>
>>> the next few
>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> weeks, and I've
>>>>>>>>>>> been refused games if I use Squats or Nids. These
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> are veteran
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> players who
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> won't play against these two armies.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> How do people who regularly go up against
>>>>>>>>>>
>>> stumpies and bugs
>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> regularly (with
>>>>>>>>>>> marines or chaos specifically) fight these two armies.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Sammy Chaos. Barprop of Slaanesh and Bane of the
>>>>>>>>>>
>>> Organised.
>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe send e-mail to:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Your use of Ya!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> hoo! Groups is subject to
>>>>>>>>>>
>>> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe send e-mail to:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe send e-mail to:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Terms of Service
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Yahoo! Domains Yahoo! Domains
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> <http://us.adserver.yahoo.com/l?M=201903.1443829.3021311.1268964/D
>>>
>>>>>>>> =egroupmai
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> l/S=1700059081:N/A=661891/rand=752607469>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe send e-mail to:
>>>>>>>>>
>>> netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Terms of Service
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ***********************************************
>>>>>>>>>> This message confirms that this E-Mail
>>>>>>>>>> has been scanned for the presence of
>>>>>>>>>> Computer Virus, and deemed Virus-Free
>>>>>>>>>> by F-Secure Antivirus
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Mon, 28 May 2001 09:30:31 +0200
>>>>>>>>>> ***********************************************
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ***********************************************
>>>>>>>>>> This message confirms that this E-Mail
>>>>>>>>>> has been scanned for the presence of
>>>>>>>>>> Computer Virus, and deemed Virus-Free
>>>>>>>>>> by F-Secure Antivirus
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Mon, 28 May 2001 09:43:57 +0200
>>>>>>>>>> ***********************************************
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe send e-mail to:
>>>>>>>>>
>>> netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
>>>>>> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ***********************************************
>>>>>> This message confirms that this E-Mail
>>>>>> has been scanned for the presence of
>>>>>> Computer Virus, and deemed Virus-Free
>>>>>> by F-Secure Antivirus
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mon, 28 May 2001 12:51:22 +0200
>>>>>> ***********************************************
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ***********************************************
>>>>> This message confirms that this E-Mail
>>>>> has been scanned for the presence of
>>>>> Computer Virus, and deemed Virus-Free
>>>>> by F-Secure Antivirus
>>>>>
>>>>> Mon, 28 May 2001 13:12:58 +0200
>>>>> ***********************************************
>>>>>
>>>>> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>>>>>
>>>>> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
>>>>
>> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>>
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>>>
>>> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>>
>> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>>
>> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
Received on Mon May 28 2001 - 13:58:46 UTC