Hi!
My have things changed.... You'll have to pardon some of us, like Josh,
I haven't read a WD since the late 190's, heck when people talk about
Dark Eldar and newer tyranid stuff I dont have a clue, even the fluff
has changed to a degree.
I liked the older dark green color, there seems to many units that use
black as it is, be nice to use a different color.
"Wrong" is relative, after all, we all work in different "time zones" as
far as 40k fluff goes. Me I'm stuff in around WD 144 and before, so all
I can remember are old color schemes, use what you will and enjoy it.
Peter
rscc wrote:
>
>
> Inquisitor e-group - GW_Inquisitor-subscribe_at_yahoogroups.com
>
>> You mean there is 3Ed fluff???
>
>
> There is.
>
>
>
>> Wow. Last I looked it had been
>> reduced to half paragraphs sandwiched between bogus battle reps.
>
>
> Look again. There has been much more in White Dwarves, and other material,
> lately.
>
>> First
>> off, I own NOTHING to do with WH40K3Ed.
>
>
> Err...........so you said something was one way in 3rd edition just for fun
> then?
>
>> And, from I have seen, the Ravenwing
>> color schemes depend on who is painting the model, as I have seen them in
>> the DA green on GW adverts and on their web site.
>
>
>
> Well, that's wrong too. The Ravenwing are black in all 3rd edition material.
> The studio Ravenwing models are black (models displayed in several WD's, and on
> the Ravenwing biker box set, and on websties, etc. Not green ones). They are
> mentioned in a lot of fluff *specifically* as being black, with a differing
> badge. Fact: their armour is black. Have a look at the Dark Angels Index
> Asartes article in WD254 (that could be 255 if you are in the US), that'll
> explain things nicely to you.
>
> Rob
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
Received on Fri Jun 08 2001 - 22:59:21 UTC