Hm, yes but one should perhaps then concentrate on winning with the units
one has got, rather than to make new ones? Remember that even if the Squats
haven't won many games in our group, they have probably done so in many
other groups. It all comes down to deviceing a winning strategy. Let us
change armies for a couple of battles and see how tings works out!!!! Rather
than to introduce new armies to unbalance the squats. Actually, I consider
the squats one of the hardest armies to beat!
Nils
-----Original Message-----
From: eivind.borgeteien_at_... [mailto:eivind.borgeteien@...]
Sent: 12. juni 2001 11:13
To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
Subject: [NetEpic ML] On the new squat units
Sensitivity: Confidential
One of the main grudges people have against the squats is that they are hard
to break. The Shortbeards are much easier to break and should provide some
easier VPs for the oponent. This way it should be very well balanced.
The Slayer Cult is taken from WFB and I think it would have been introduced
sooner or later if GW has continued their squat range for epic. At least
thats my personal POV...
It WAS introduced as a joke, but then as a Companycard with 3 detatchments,
with +6, +7 or something in CAF. As a specialcard of one detatchment with
far reduced CAF, I think this units deserves some testing.
Isnt it food for thought that the only ones crying "wolf!" here are the ones
that always have beaten the Squats.....? :-)
There are at present time no stats for the APC carrying the robots. I havent
gotten around to do that yet, but you might want to take a look at the
Hellfury APC
Eivind
To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Received on Tue Jun 12 2001 - 09:32:22 UTC