A 'special card' or support card for these 'Stormtroopers' would be good,
although like all good megalomaniacs I have enough figures(unfortunately not
painted) to field a 'Stormtrooper' Battalion + support, I can't help it I
just collect these things.............The Guard is strong by numbers!!
Warren
-----Original Message-----
From: jyrki.saari_at_... <jyrki.saari@...>
To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
Date: 13 June 2001 06:27
Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Alternative IG units
>The troops would probably be some specialist branch of the stormtroopers,
as
>I just cant't see the Imperium giving specialist training to your average
IG
>footslogger, so a special card (EXPENSIVE one) is in order.
>
>Jyrki Saari
>
>-There is no such thing as free lunch because eating takes time and time is
>money.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ext primarch_at_... [mailto:primarch@...]
>> Sent: 12. June 2001 16:43
>> To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
>> Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Alternative IG units
>>
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>> Sounds good to me! I like units that have that air-cav feel, like
>> modern rangers and such.
>>
>> They should be a special card probably or an expensive support card.
>> Then again a company card that may only attach "air-cav" units may be
>> good too.
>>
>> The infantry would probably be assault troops, with +1 CAF, the
>> transports should have only heavy bolters (sorta like a Vietnam troop
>> carrier).
>>
>> Would be nice to see pictures, go for it!
>>
>> Peter
>>
>>
>> --- In netepic_at_y..., "sarah-warren" <warren.c_at_b...> wrote:
>> > Hello Guys,
>> >
>> > I have a concept that I voiced a short while ago. It is for a
>> specialist
>> > Air Assault Unit, the ideas are here in my tiny mind but I
>> have done
>> nothing
>> > concrete on them yet......but I will.
>> >
>> > The basic infantry would be the IG Assault troops
>> > The transports are a very nice model by Gladiator Games, each
>> transport
>> > capable of carrying 3 stands, i.e. two transports to an Assault
>> Platoon.
>> > The transport themselves would have similar stats to the
>> Thunderhawk,
>> > without the firer power.
>> >
>> > Also air portable would be Robots, Rapiers and Tarantulas ( I have
>> quite a
>> > few models to use!!).
>> >
>> > As air support I have flights of Attack ships, 3 to a flight.
>> Basically the
>> > same as SM Landspeeders but a +1 on the Def due to the enclosed
>> canopy. For
>> > these I use GZG jet copters.
>> >
>> > I will work on the stats and the models and try to sponge a digital
>> camera
>> > for some photos........
>> >
>> > Any thoughts?
>> >
>> > Warren
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Peter Ramos <primarch_at_b...>
>> > To: netepic_at_y... <netepic_at_y...>
>> > Date: 12 June 2001 00:27
>> > Subject: [NetEpic ML] Alternative IG units
>> >
>> >
>> > >Hi!
>> > >
>> > >Has anyone ever made some rules for specific IG armies like
>> catachan and
>> > >such? I remeber something like this some time ago, but can't find
>> it.
>> > >Does anyone remember? Was it you Jyrki?
>> > >
>> > >If its not been done how about some ideas, I dont know much about
>> them
>> > >so I am dependent on those that are more up to date with IG lore.
>> > >
>> > >Peter
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>> > >
>> > >Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
>> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>> > >
>> > >
>>
>>
>> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>>
>> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
>> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>>
>>
>
>To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
Received on Sun Jun 10 2001 - 10:42:10 UTC