Re: [Epic] Titan Legions

From: Brett Hollindale <agro_at_...>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 1997 07:56:42 GMT

At 09:13 PM 14/1/97 -0800, you wrote:
>Mike Fuller wrote:
>>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> It appears that our gaming group is a minority in that we're
>> really NOT into titans. In fact we have a house rule limiting 1 titan per
>> army per battle. So when we so the price for Titan Legions we decided not
>> to purchase it. However, after reading this mailling list I'm having
>> second thoughts. There have been some rules attributed to Titan Legions.
>> We're specifically local for rule errata and additions that effect
>> non-titans. So I was wondering if it's worth the price (provided we can
>> even find it.) We're not interested in paying big bucks just for a model
>> as large as my cat!
>>
>> Thanks, and good gaming to all.
>>
>> Mike
>
>I have to agree with you, we use titans as supporting troops and
>concentrate on armor and infantry. In fact, I am amazed by the number of
>people that equip their titans with CC weapons. I have partitcipated in
>only one battle that a titan was close assaulted.

I've always found close assault to be one of the easiest ways to kill a titan.
(And I use it a lot!!)

Agro


> It was back when we
>played the first edition. BattleTech is a more entertaining game for
>Titan/Mech warfare. My opinion is probably not popular here, but there
>it is.
>
>danlobb_at_...
>
Received on Tue Jan 14 1997 - 07:56:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 13:08:59 UTC