Re: [Epic] cheese

From: Brett Hollindale <agro_at_...>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 1997 22:18:40 GMT

At 12:00 PM 22/1/97 -0600, you wrote:
>At 16:30 01/22/1997 +0000, you wrote:
>>I'm glad to find someone else with the same opinion of Doomweavers.
>>Since subscribing to the list I've been astounded at the number of
>>refrences to Doomweavers as cheesy.
>Well, if many people consider them cheesy, then someone is not using them
>correctly if they consider them useless.
>The only thing I really consider cheesy is that they can drop a warhound in
>one shot. Of course, the only time I used this I was playing a marine
>player who had hammered me with bloodclaws in thunderhawks who were attached
>to the old ravenwing company. One of my dets fell back first turn and left
>the board, so when the other det rolled a hit on each of his warhounds and
>one of them failed his save I didn't exactly feel bad.
>About the whole Doomweaver/GD thing, I still haven't found it, but I
>remember the explanation ran something along the lines of playing a card to
>save the demon was analagous to making an armor save (hence no cards in

No cards in hth??? That's not MY understanding...


> and since the normal armor save is ignored by doomwavers . . .
>Cheesy? Yes. I never pressed the point if someone disagreed, but I wasn't
>about to give up the ability when someone else pointed it out ot me.
Received on Wed Jan 22 1997 - 22:18:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 13:09:02 UTC