RAZOR-WIRE
Counts as Difficult for Infantry, no effect for vehicles and w=
ar engines
Model: 40mm x 10 mm base covered with a spiral of wire. Simple=
enough.
TANK BLOCKADES
Counts as Difficult terrain for vehicles, no eff=
ect for war engines/infantry.
Provides cover to models directly behind.
Mo=
del: 40mm x 10mm base with three little "pyramids" of sticks, painted
steel=
-ish color.
The "Defender" in a scenario gets to place any of these items =
on the table
before setting up.
I can just imagine Tank Blockades blocking=
off roads in a city area, or razor
wire surrounding an Ork compound, etc..=
.
Do you think giving these away free is unbalancing? perhaps, if
attacke=
r/defender is predetermined, a points value could be given?
I can think of=
several ways of handling this.
1)Give the stuff a points value
2)Use it i=
n a scenario with specified setup areas.
3)Give each side a specified poin=
ts value of fortifications.
This is for a one-off game, you just both set u=
p fortifications(maybe around objectives) and play.
Good ideas. I would say=
each fortification cost maybe 2 pts per centimeter. Also you want rulse fo=
r making ways through them, for instance Tanks can crush a way through razo=
r wire while infantry can blow up tank blockades with gernades.
----------=
---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-------------------------
"Your incorrect assumptions are threefold."
"You =
assume law still reigns in the Five Galaxies"
"You assume that we would be =
bound by precedents and precepts from the last 10 million years."
"But your=
most incorrect assumption of all is to assume that we care."
-David=
Brin, Infinity's Shore
---------------------------------------------------=
--James Nugent----------------------------------------
- application/ms-tnef attachment: stored
Received on Thu Jul 31 1997 - 16:42:47 UTC