Re: [Epic] Introduce Myself

From: Tyler Provick <bprovick_at_...>
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 1997 15:24:01 -0400

At 08:53 PM 9/7/97 +0100, you wrote:
>Tyler Provick <bprovick_at_...> has carefully scribed:
>
>>>>Sauron1 writes; I still play Epic2nd, but love the new lead, except for the
>>>>stupid Warlord Titan! sauron1
>>>
>>>Well, Sauron old chap, I have to disagree with you here. The old titan
>>>sometimes looked as it would fall over if a Gretchin gave it a good
>>>kick, while the new one looks diamond-hard. The new Gargants are better
>>>and more Orky too, I reckon.
>>>
>>>
>>Actually, I think that the old titan looks gracefull and elegant (For an
>>Imperial Titan) as opposed to the boxy Battletech/Power Ranger new Warlord.
>
>You're insulting it by comparing to to Power Rangers; as far as I
>remember, the big Power-Rangers Super-Mega-Dino-Fireball-XL5-Hyper-Zord
>looked like a bloke with cardboard boxes on his arms and legs. What a
>coincidence- it was.
>
>And I thought that was the point of the Imperium- not to be graceful and
>elegant. Eldar yes, Imperium no. It's probably all that heavy power
>armour the marines wear.
>
I did say Gracefull and Elegant for the Imperials. I just don't like the
robot, why would they make his legs square? Isn't a circle more stable? I
thought a hollow round tube (Like some of our bones) was stronger then a
square box of the same width and material.

Tyler
Why compromise looks and stabilty? For money of course
Received on Mon Sep 08 1997 - 19:24:01 UTC