RE: [Epic] Introduce Myself

From: Miller, Chris <CMiller_at_...>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 1997 14:35:32 -0500

>>Well, Sauron old chap, I have to disagree with you here. The old titan
>>sometimes looked as it would fall over if a Gretchin gave it a good
>>kick, while the new one looks diamond-hard. The new Gargants are better
>>and more Orky too, I reckon.
>>
>>
>Actually, I think that the old titan looks gracefull and elegant (For an
>Imperial Titan) as opposed to the boxy Battletech/Power Ranger new Warlord.
>
>I guess tastes differ.
>
>Tyler
>
------> My take on it (playing both B-tech and Epic etc):
The new Warlord will look better with a camo paint job than the old one,
but with
the more typical ornate paint job for the old ones, but the old-style
paint job
will just make the new Warlord look like a Transformer...

(Disclaimer: I still have 3 or 4 of the old ones on the sprue and so
will
not be buying a new one for some time, if ever.)

Can we come up with a better ID system for these guys, also.
I'm thinking the Rounded Plastic Warlord (6-packs) would be
the Mark I, the post-titan legions skull-headed square-shouldered
one would be Mark II, and the New one would be the Mark III.
(The old, aborted not-available-in-the-U.S.-as-far-as-I-know-and-
if-it-was-it-wasn'-for-long legendary lead warlord would be the
Mark 0, if we must refer to it....

Chris Miller
(who's current titan tally for Warlords is 6 Imperial complete + 4 Chaos
complete+Banelord+5 Imperial under construction + 3 waiting to
begin. Finally decided that that Corvus head wasn't so goofy...)

>
Received on Mon Sep 08 1997 - 19:35:32 UTC