Re: [Epic] Net Epic

From: Brett Hollindale <agro_at_...>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 1997 11:56:17 GMT

At 06:41 PM 6/2/97 +1100, you wrote:
>>
>> Hi guys!
>>
>> As is my custom nowadays I was reviewing todays opinions on movement and
>> initiative. What is interesting is that two systems seem to have the
>> publics approval. One is the one I posted based on unit type(Titans move
>> first etc.)and the other was Tony's idea(units move according to orders
>> ie. charge first etc.).
>
>My vote is still to use alternating movement, nothing else. I like the idea
>of having different phases for different classes of model, however I don't
>want the added complication. Maybe the rules should provide this as the
>"basic" option, and phased movement should be an "advanced" optional rule.
>
>Philip


Yeah, remember Keep It Simple (Stupid)

Agro
Received on Tue Feb 11 1997 - 11:56:17 UTC