Re: [Epic] Net Epic

From: Jyrki Saari <js54904_at_...>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 1997 12:05:49 +0200 (EET)

> On Tue 11 Feb, Peter Ramos wrote:
>
> >
> > The solution would be that when a unit with fall back orders much
> > retreat away from the enemy or to the nearest cover THAT IS NOT AN
> > OBJECTIVE! The rational is troops have been briefed where the objectives
> > are, and if they are running and hiding from danger it is very illogical
> > to state that they would run to a building that they know it is the most
> > likely place the enemy is going to(if not there already).
> >
> > Thus fallback movement is as normal except that it cannot be towards an
> > objective regardless of distance. Opinions!!!
>
> I vote for your suggestion, it seems the best solution to me

Me too. It is simple and leaves no marigin for rules lawyering.

> > United we stand!
> > Peter
> >
> >
>
> --
>
> Sean Smith
>
> Home - Seans_at_...
>
> --
>
Jyrki Saari
js54904_at_...
Received on Wed Feb 12 1997 - 10:05:49 UTC