On Tue 11 Feb, Peter Ramos wrote:
>
> The solution would be that when a unit with fall back orders much
> retreat away from the enemy or to the nearest cover THAT IS NOT AN
> OBJECTIVE! The rational is troops have been briefed where the objectives
> are, and if they are running and hiding from danger it is very illogical
> to state that they would run to a building that they know it is the most
> likely place the enemy is going to(if not there already).
>
> Thus fallback movement is as normal except that it cannot be towards an
> objective regardless of distance. Opinions!!!
I vote for your suggestion, it seems the best solution to me
> United we stand!
> Peter
>
>
--
Sean Smith
Home - Seans_at_...
--
Received on Mon Feb 10 1997 - 23:33:57 UTC