Re: [Epic] Specialised Detachments

From: Martin Hasko <martin.hasko_at_...>
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 1998 13:15:38 +0100

I play 40k alot. And I do tend to have one purpose detachments. I find it
difficult to mix tanks with infantry (even if that is a must do thing). But
most of my tank det:s are made of only tanks. So instead of having a
detachment that is all-round they all have to help each others to suceed. That
must be one of the reasons i keep loosing in epic40k, and i'm actually
thinking of selling all of it. Haha, and one kind of eldar detachments ALWAYS
end up with only one (two) kind of units in it.....my jetbikes and vypers. No
way i could cram tanks into that...or so it feels :)

Kienatan, eldar farseer (soon ex.)

Matthew Sprange wrote:

> I've just introduced a WH40K player to Epic and it was interesting to see
> how he built his detachments - each one was a 40K army (I know that is
> partially the point), mixing, for instance, Warp Spiders, Banshees, Fire
> Prisms and Guardians.
>
> I have to admit, I tend to go for more specialised detachments (all
> artillery, with defending troopers, all AA guns, all Jet Bikes, or
> whatever).
>
> I was just curious to see how everyone else plays. Do you tend to have
> single purpose detachments fulfilling specific roles on the battlefield or
> do you generally have all-purpose detachments?
Received on Sat Jan 10 1998 - 12:15:38 UTC