Re: [Epic] Yet Another "Silly Question" for the Primarchs

From: J. Michael Looney <mlooney_at_...>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 1998 10:29:21 -0600

Dirk Vormann wrote:
>
> > Please find a RULE that states that. The rules never states that an
> > army can only take one SC. It does state that there is a limit for
> > 'Nids. The list has gone over this before, I still want it submitted as
> > a question. The fact that rather small detachemts cost a lot more than
> > they would if taken as "normal" tends to mean that this is a "flavor
> > freak only" problem.
> Not really. Marine Armies have no use of stubborm from the Commander,
> other Armies do.
>
> WARNING:
> This is based on nothing but the letters of the rules:
>
<snip o matic>

I tend to be a bit of a "rules lawyer" at time (side effect of being a
programmer. That IS what we do). While I will grant that the
detachment NAME "Supreme Commander" tends to indicate that "There can be
only one", the RULES doesn't say that, which is why I want Allen to ask
them.

I did think of a reason why a non flavor freak might want to do this, as
side from stubborn, in that it does insure that a gargant has maximum
shields. I am not sure that that is worth 50 points or not.


-- 
Sillyness is the last refuse of the doomed.  P. Opus
--
Geek code: GAT d-- s:-- a C+++ UL++ P+ L++ !E- W+++ N++ o K++ w+++ !o
!M-- !V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP t++ 5+ X R+++ tv+ b++++ DI++++ D G++ e+
h---(*)
r+++ y+++(**)
http://www.spellbooksoftware.com
Received on Thu Jan 22 1998 - 16:29:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 13:10:13 UTC