Re: [Epic] Yet Another "Silly Question" for the Primarchs

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: Dirk Vormann <DVormann_at_...-duisburg.de>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 1998 09:16:22 +0100 (MEZ)

> Your point is well made. But having more than one "Supreme Commander"
> detachment is silly.
It is not, believe me. I would love to field several Supreme Commander
dets in larger battles to get everyone stubborn.

DV
Received on Thu Jan 01 1970 - 00:00:00 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Michael Reed : "Re: [Epic] army review"
Previous message: Alan E & Carmel J Brain: "Re: [Epic] Cancon (non) deals"
Maybe in reply to: J. Michael Looney: "[Epic] Yet Another "Silly Question" for the Primarchs"
Next in thread: Erik Malmcrona: "Re: [Epic] Yet Another "Silly Question" for the Primarchs"
Reply: Erik Malmcrona: "Re: [Epic] Yet Another "Silly Question" for the Primarchs"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 13:10:14 UTC