J. Michael Looney wrote:
>
> Scott Shupe wrote:
> >
> > Los wrote:
> > >
> > > So are we not supposed to discuss netepic here?
> >
> > Feel free to. It's a version of Epic, after all (even if
> > it's not sanctioned by GW). Just make sure you it's clear that
> > you're talking about it and not SM/TL (or E40k).
> >
>
> There was an official ruling that Net Epic was off topic here, when it
> was in the early design stages. This, BTW, is why some members of the
> Net Epic design group have a problem with this mailing list.
The problem wasn't that NetEpic was being discussed here. It was that
it
was being designed here. Some of us would have been interested in the
status, or in how rule difference might have made situations turn out
differently, or what regular NetEpic players liked about their rules.
But we didn't want to have the design discussion on the net. It was a
large amount of traffic.
At least, that's the way I remember it.
andy
--
Andy Skinner
askinner_at_...
Received on Tue Feb 10 1998 - 18:55:54 UTC