155 # here at 5' 6", but at 47 think I'm doin OK.
> ----------
> From: J. Michael Looney[SMTP:mlooney_at_...]
> Sent: Thursday, February 12, 1998 8:38 AM
> To: space-marine_at_...
> Subject: Re: [Epic]Americans in UK
>
> Matthew Sprange wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >> But here, the only Americans we
> > >> tend to see are either on the TV or they come here as tourists
> (you
> > >> can spot
> > >> those ones a mile off).
> > >>
> > >--------> So was it the boots or the hat?
> > >: )
> >
> > Ummm, if you want the truth, we have a joke here that all Americans
> > are fat.
> > How much do you weigh?
>
> 150 lbs. That would be 68 Kg. At 5' 10" (177 cm) that is NOT fat.
>
> --
> Sillyness is the last refuse of the doomed. P. Opus
> http://www.spellbooksoftware.com
> --
> -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
> Version: 3.1
> GAT d-- s:- a38 US++ P+ L+ E W+++ N++ K++ w++ O- M- V-- PS+ PE++ Y PGP
> t++
> 5 X R+++ tv+ b++++ DI+++ D G+ e+ h--- r+++ y+++(**)
> ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
>
From "Mark Humphries (EUKFINC1PO)"
<mhumphri_at_...> Thu Feb 12 10:28:33 1998
Return-Path: <owner-space-marine_at_...>
Delivered-To: ListSaver-of-space-marine_at_...
Received: (qmail 31747 invoked from network); 12 Feb 1998 18:28:32 -0000
Received: from montezuma.acc.umu.se (majordom_at_130.239.18.147)
by vault.findmail.com with SMTP; 12 Feb 1998 18:28:32 -0000
Received: (from majordom_at_localhost)
by montezuma.acc.umu.se (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA22784
for space-marine-outgoing; Thu, 12 Feb 1998 19:27:53 +0100 (MET)
Message-Id: <199802121827.NAA05159_at_...>
From: "Mark Humphries (EUKFINC1PO)"
<mhumphri_at_...>
To: space-marine_at_...
Subject: RE: [Epic] SM Chaos - wasUncheesy detachments
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 1998 18:24:40 -0000
X-Priority: 3
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.0.1459.59)
Sender: owner-space-marine_at_...
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: space-marine_at_...
> ----------
> From: Aaron P Teske[SMTP:Mithramuse+_at_...]
> Sent: 12 February 1998 17:34
> To: space-marine_at_...
> Subject: Re: [Epic] SM Chaos - wasUncheesy detachments
>
>
> Excerpts from Epic: 11-Feb-98 Re: [Epic] SM Chaos - wasUn.. by Thane
> Morgan_at_...
> > b) the LOB was probably intended to be a command unit (for orders
> > purposes), because otherwise it was screwed.
> I'd *love* to know how you figure this. The LoB was one of the things I
> *really* hated to see my Chaos opponent field, because it always managed
> to do a lot of damage to me before I could kill it -- if I could.
> (And, for the record, we didn't treat the things as command units,
> either. And they *still* kicked *ss.)
We didn't treat these and command unit and until we found out about
Psychic attacks and Daemons they very rarely got killed. Mind you my luck
with hitting anything is complete rubbish (see comments made about Magnus
the Red), but LoB paid for itself because of the amount of firepower that
came its way and it still survived.
Received on Thu Feb 12 1998 - 18:28:29 UTC