Re: [Epic] GW and this list.

From: Thane Morgan <thane_at_...>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 1998 16:28:26 -0700

Chris Miller wrote:
>
> > I wandered through the subscriber list in late January to see
> >if anyone else from CMU was on it, or if I was on it twice again.
> >Apparently Tuomas is still subscribed, and the account is accessed on
> >a regular basis. However, E40k seems to be dying the slow death, and
> >I don't remember too many articles for a game that supposed to be one
> >of their three core games.
>
> ----------> I don't think it's been too bad - Though we've had a few too
> many "here's a bunch of shots of our armies" type articles and fewer
> tactics, interesting unit combos, and battle reports IMO. The fate card adds
> have been nice, and the battle tracker too.
> >
> > I still think we make for a poor sounding board. As far as I
> >can tell, we worry about completely different aspects of the games
> >than the typical GW gamer. (The ones who contribute the most to the
> >sales figures)
> >
> >Mark
>
> ----------> Well we've already added the units left out from SM/TL and
> covered plenty of rule tweaks...do we not say "this is cool" or "look dude!"
> enough? : )
>
> Chris Miller
>
> >Plus, I think we are all way outside what their targeted market is;
10-16 year olds. Maybe we should ask for more scantily clad female
units, or how our acne has cleared up since playing E40K.

Thane
Received on Fri Feb 13 1998 - 23:28:26 UTC