Re: [Epic] GW and this list.

From: Chris Miller <ironstar_at_...>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 1998 19:20:47 -0600

> I wandered through the subscriber list in late January to see
>if anyone else from CMU was on it, or if I was on it twice again.
>Apparently Tuomas is still subscribed, and the account is accessed on
>a regular basis. However, E40k seems to be dying the slow death, and
>I don't remember too many articles for a game that supposed to be one
>of their three core games.

----------> I don't think it's been too bad - Though we've had a few too
many "here's a bunch of shots of our armies" type articles and fewer
tactics, interesting unit combos, and battle reports IMO. The fate card adds
have been nice, and the battle tracker too.
>
> I still think we make for a poor sounding board. As far as I
>can tell, we worry about completely different aspects of the games
>than the typical GW gamer. (The ones who contribute the most to the
>sales figures)
>
>Mark

----------> Well we've already added the units left out from SM/TL and
covered plenty of rule tweaks...do we not say "this is cool" or "look dude!"
enough? : )

Chris Miller

>
Received on Fri Feb 13 1998 - 01:20:47 UTC