Re: [Epic] RGMW Newsgroup.

From: Sean Smith <seans_at_...>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 1998 11:19:11 +1300 (BST)

On Tue 24 Feb, Steve Sheldon wrote:
> > I honestly believe Epic40k is an attempt to return to the more free
> form
> >structure of 1st ed. Then again, I play Epic2nd !
> >
> I was actually thinking that e40k was disliked because it required
> thought, which is evidently missing on the newsgroup.
> Steve
> --
> If you choke a Smurf, what colour does it go?

I have to agree with you Steve. As an overall packed e40k is superior
to any other version of epic I have played. Yes epic 40k does has have its
faults (e.g movement not being reduced if moving through certain types of
terrain, the dropping of Squats). I don't believe amoung its faults are IG
infantry, Land raiders or support weapons. I play with a IG army mainly
(which uses only 1 detachment of spacemarine drop troops) and have won
around 60% of the battles I have fought. Each army has units in it which are
better point for point than other armies (e.g IG - artillery, space marines
- Land raiders and thunderhawks, eldar - aspect warriors and disrupt
weapons), overall I think this excellent, because it gives each army unique
strengths and weakness, thereby giving it an unique flavour.
As regard to level comment on this list I have to agree with you again
Steve and I am not refering to all the off topic emails (I am guilty as
any one else this regard). I hoped that the list would discuss tactics,
comment on battle plans etc, while there are some good posts, most of the
stuff is worthless.

Sean Smith
Received on Thu Jan 01 1970 - 00:00:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 13:10:23 UTC