Re: [Epic] [versions] was RGMW Newsgroup.

From: Sauron Moridor <sauron1_at_...>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 1998 14:31:45 -0500

Sauron1 writes; Kevin;

     Eloquence was never my long suite, I was way to tired to remember the
number of the WRG change. But the results were devastating to many clubs,
ours survived,but the Toronto and Buffalo ones didn,t . Until DBA I never
played for years. I met the author on a "business" trip as He and his Wife
are Professors of computer studies.

    There was one other factor that is an antithesis of the
pic2nd -Epic40k change. WRG required hundreds of miniatures to play a game
and therefore starting up was very expensive, where DBA armies cost about
$30.00 at the most. and is played on a 24"x24" maximum surface. I really do
not understand how I can enjoy the simplicity of DBA and not that of E40k? I
believe for me personally it was the "Flavour of the units"

    But DBM came out because all those WRG players had all those thousands
of miniatures.(ME for one. I have eight full armies of em=25 printers
storage drawers full )

    I believe just the opposite for our change. GW has made it more
expensive. Or can you have a good game just out of the box?( not a criticism
HIT just asking )


sauron1_at_...
Received on Tue Feb 24 1998 - 19:31:45 UTC