Re: [Epic] Orks in various rules set

From: Brett Hollindale <agro_at_...>
Date: Sun, 1 Mar 1998 08:17:11 +0100 (MET)

At 04:34 PM 28/2/98 -0600, you wrote:
>Mark A Shieh wrote:
>>
>> Brett Hollindale <agro_at_...> writes:
>> > >To end the flame fest that may follow all of this:
>> > >Epic 40K
>> > >6 gargants (Gargant, Great, Mega, plus each with commander)
>> > >
>> > >SM/TL with Warlord
>> > >4 gargants.
>>
>> I thought SM/TL + Warlords had 6 types of gargants. Mekboy,
>> Slasha, Great, Mega, Slasha commander, and Great Commander. The last
>> two always had max power fields because they led the gargant big mob.
>>
>> I'm still a bit confused why you list SM/TL without Warlords
>> as a complete game.
>>
>
><sarcasm>
>You mean its not?
></sarcasm>
>
>The reason why I started this sub-thread of the ongoing version flame is
>that Argo seems the think that HE can use that tactic when talking about
>1st ed. If he can, I can.


Good God! Don't blame me for this. All I said was that if you like the
flavourless gruel of E40K, you would have loved the even more flavousless
(less flavoursome?) gruel of SM 1st edition...

Agro



>
>For those that are keeping track:
>
>0th ed:
>WD 100
>1st ed:
>2 box sets + 1 book + 12 or so WD issues
>2nd ed:
>2 box sets + 4 books + 12 or so WD issues
>3rd ed:
>1 box set + 3-5 WD issues (so far)
>
>If you don't have all of the above you don't have the full game rules.
>As it so happens I think I DO have a full set of all 3 versions. I may
>be missing some of the WD 2nd Ed rules/Q&A's
>
>
Received on Sun Mar 01 1998 - 07:17:11 UTC