Re: [Off Topic] Epic Fantasy was [Epic] Civilians

From: Brett Hollindale <agro_at_...>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 1998 22:41:46 +0100 (MET)

At 07:04 PM 9/3/98 -0700, you wrote:
>Elaine P wrote:
>>
>> >Sauron1 writes; Agro;
>> >
>> > Maybe Because we do not wish to start a flame war by posting
>> >provocative statements such as "males as Cannon fodder" We seem to do
>> >just fine starting serious flames over Epic version rules thank you.;-)
>> >
>> > I prefer using IG as cannon fodder anyway reguardless of the
gender of
>> >the troops.
>>
>> Sorry, I don't want to start a flame war. I just wanted to point out
>> that as opposed to GW games, FR! allows much more flexibility in
>> designing armies, doesn't require purchase of minis from only one
>> company, and works in all scales. My 15mm fantasy army really doesn't
>> have men as cannon fodder.
>>
>> I used to play WHFB, but have become disillusioned with it. I liked the
>> old-style dark elves (and Eldar guardians) because they had female
>> figures that fought alongside the males in the rank and file. I know
>> several players who lamented the disappearance of the more risque or
>> "R-rated" figures, but many good female figures disappeared as well.


In what way weren't the "R-rated" figures "good"? ;-)

Agro



>>
>> --Elaine
>>
>> ______________________________________________________
>> Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>
>You should check out Reapers line of female 28mm fantasy (part of Dark
>Eden). They look better than any other female figures I've seen for
>realism and beauty.
>
>Thane
Received on Tue Mar 10 1998 - 21:41:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 13:10:28 UTC