Re: [Epic] house rules (was Re: General Enquiry)

From: mlooney - IOnet <mlooney_at_...>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 1998 18:26:35 -0600

Miller, Chris wrote:

> > The main problem I have with fluff arguments is (1) fluff
> > is not rules, it's color text and means nothing, at best it gives
> > you an idea of what a 'typical' force is made of but who says you
> > always have to play a typical army? And (2) (more importantly)
> > different people have different interpretations of the fluff. As
> > an example, in WH40k I've heard arguments both for and against the
> > all-aspect eldar army, both based on the background. Which side
> > is right?
> >
> ---------> Means nothing? So would you pay for "generic unrealistic
> science fantasy rules" with "generic unrealistic minis"? I'd bet not,

Ah, yes, where can I get them? I think you meant to spell that "Dirt
Side" or maybe "Striker"...
Received on Fri Mar 27 1998 - 00:26:35 UTC