Chris Miller wrote:
> >> >
> >> ---------> Means nothing? So would you pay for "generic unrealistic
>
> >> science fantasy rules" with "generic unrealistic minis"? I'd bet
> not,
> >
> >Ah, yes, where can I get them? I think you meant to spell that "Dirt
>
> >Side" or maybe "Striker"...
> >
> ----------> Which have you spent more money on? Those or some GW
> miniatures
> & rules? Nothing wrong with generic rules, but I find it hard to
> believe
> anyone on this list really dislikes/ignores completely the fluff.
>
Adjusted for inflation and real income? Generic WWII rules and
figures, Generic (well, ok AD&D) rules and figures
> Besides I thought Dirtside was supposed to be "more" realistic. I know
>
> Striker I/II were. We're talking (your observation I believe) about
> Napoleonics with titans...
While the GZG stuff is somewhat better than GW stuff I still would class
them as "unrealistic".
--
Sillyness is the last refuse of the doomed. P. Opus
http://www.spellbooksoftware.com
--
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GAT d-- s:- a38 US++ P+ L+ E W+++ N++ K++ w++ O- M- V-- PS+ PE++ Y PGP
t++
5 X R+++ tv+ b++++ DI+++ D G+ e+ h--- r+++ y+++(**)
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Received on Fri Mar 27 1998 - 15:04:14 UTC