Re: [Epic] Net Epic

From: Brett Hollindale <agro_at_...>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 07:15:49 GMT

At 03:04 PM 26/2/97 +0000, you wrote:
>> My two cents would be about the lack of "we" that seems to be going into
>> this whole thing, but if I am the only one with a problem, then I guess it
>> must be just me...
>>
>> Agro
>>
>I'm not sure what you mean by this since I take extra care to always use
>"we"(other than just saying me) and the reason of doing this proyect in
>the first place is that everyone states their opinions, but of course
>one opinion will always have more backers than others, my job is only to
>present what the majority wants, my personal opinion is secondary and
>will remain so.
>
>Peter


>> My two cents would be about the lack of "we" that seems to be going into
>> this whole thing, but if I am the only one with a problem, then I guess it
>> must be just me...
>>
>> Agro
>>
>I'm not sure what you mean by this since I take extra care to always use
>"we"(other than just saying me) and the reason of doing this project in
>the first place is that everyone states their opinions, but of course
>one opinion will always have more backers than others, my job is only to
>present what the majority wants, my personal opinion is secondary and
>will remain so.
>
>Peter
>


Below is the post I snipped to illustrate my concern. It seems that you
weren't very careful with the I/we thing here...


>
various titan costs snipped
>
>Comment: I will try to bring back the old AT rules on this one, it was
>truely fearsome as it destroyed anything without shields without save
>and shield targets were imune. If caught without shield-ouch! Bye
>Titan! I'll tone it down somewhat but it will be still pretty powerful
>and thus the cost. I post the full rules later.

 I will try...
^^^
 I'll tone it down...
^^^^^^


>
Orky costs snipped
>I think the gargant has traditionally been harder to destroy than a

 I think...
^^^

>warlord so the hull costs more the weapon though are less expensive on
>average.
>As for the Mega Gargant and the Mekboy gargant they come pretty much
>with the same weapons so I left them alone with their present cost.


so I left them...
  ^^^


>
>Tyranids need such a overhaul that we'll probably redo the whole army!
>
>Well, we will combine or price discussion with the weapons description,
>so nows the time to put in your two cents about what the weapon does to
>bring it in equality with its values.
>
>United we stand!
>Peter
>


Now, you SAY that your opinion is always secondary, but that isn't the
feeling I get. (Now that's just my "feeling" but I usually trust my
"feelings"!) From your position as the one who poses the topics for
discussion and also final arbiter it would be pretty easy to skew things to
your personal viewpoint and it looks to me like this IS happening.

(Check your comment about Tyranids above - it looks pretty much like YOUR
opinion to me.
I know that there have been a lot of complaints about the tryanids - hence
YOUR opinion on this issue IS shared by many others - but this is just an
example of what has been disturbing me for some time...)

As I have said, I _could_ be wrong (I reckon that I have been before...) but
it seems like at least a few others have a similar problem, so I don't know...

Incidentally, this IS intended as "constructive criticism" so please take it
in the spirit in which it was intended.
 
Agro
Received on Thu Feb 27 1997 - 07:15:49 UTC