Mike Bowen wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Jul 1998, J. Michael Looney wrote:
>
> > Are we going to go back to my fav-o-rite rant?
> >
> > GW's targeting rules and why I think they suck and why power gamers
> think
> > they rule?
> >
> > Lets not forget that one Epic turn is 4 turns of WH40K, so one
> "shot" by a
> > land raider is 4+ shots in WH40K.
>
> So why can't I brew up 4 ork battlewagons each epic turn then? I can
> do
> that easy in 4 turns in 40k with an LR.
>
Good question. Not all things map out, as it were.
> I have thought about AT shots and how they need fixing-- but the
> results
> are sometime too drastic, or change the game mechanics too much.
>
> Of all, I like the idea of AT shots vs. Inf counting as 2 fp instead
> of
> the AT shot.
2 FP is one dice which means vs Orc infantry you kill on 4+. Hmm...
isn't that the same as a A/T shot?
Of course vs IG you would kill on a 3+, which is BETTER than an AT shot.
--
Sillyness is the last refuse of the doomed. P. Opus
http://www.spellbooksoftware.com
--
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GAT d-- s:- a38 US++ P+ L+ E W+++ N++ K++ w++ O- M- V-- PS+ PE++ Y PGP
t++
5 X R+++ tv+ b++++ DI+++ D G+ e+ h--- r+++ y+++(**)
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Received on Fri Jul 10 1998 - 19:06:05 UTC